LBNDX vs. MS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LBNDX (Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while MS (Morgan Stanley) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX returned 4.30%/yr vs 28.45%/yr for MS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LBNDX vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 28.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 4.30%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 28.45% annualized return.

LBNDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 7.26%
• 3Y*: 7.08%
• 5Y*: 1.56%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

MS

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 12.44%
• YTD: 28.71%
• 6M: 27.30%
• 1Y: 72.75%
• 3Y*: 43.83%
• 5Y*: 24.98%
• 10Y*: 28.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBNDX vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund	1.21%	8.42%	6.29%	6.38%	-13.67%	3.25%	7.65%	13.40%	-3.76%	9.23%
MS Morgan Stanley	28.71%	45.16%	39.73%	13.93%	-10.34%	46.65%	38.09%	32.67%	-22.76%	26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNDX and MS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1993	0.39

Return for Risk

LBNDX vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBNDX

LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 44
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MS

MS Risk / Return Rank: 92
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBNDX vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBNDX	MS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.83	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.43	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.88	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	12.81	-5.31

LBNDX vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNDX and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBNDX vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and MS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBNDX	MS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-88.12%	+61.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.08%	-18.83%	+14.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.51%	-29.24%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.33%	-32.38%	+15.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.77%	-51.33%	+31.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.47%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-33.66%	+30.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	5.70%	-4.69%

Volatility

LBNDX vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 1.12%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBNDX	MS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	7.76%	-6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.21%	21.58%	-18.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11%	25.85%	-21.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.70%	28.67%	-23.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	31.34%	-26.30%

Dividends

LBNDX vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than MS's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund	6.06%	5.92%	5.38%	4.66%	3.67%	3.71%	3.72%	4.02%	6.43%	4.82%	4.58%	5.50%
MS Morgan Stanley	1.77%	2.17%	2.82%	3.49%	3.47%	2.14%	2.04%	2.54%	2.77%	1.72%	1.66%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBNDX and MS in my portfolio?

LBNDX and MS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBNDX or MS?

MS has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to LBNDX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs MS's -88.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.