PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNDX vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNDX vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 22.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 4.31%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 26.80% annualized return.


LBNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.13%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
4.31%

MS

1D
1.88%
1M
13.05%
YTD
22.42%
6M
28.53%
1Y
71.47%
3Y*
41.02%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
26.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBNDX vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
1.63%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%
MS
Morgan Stanley
22.42%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNDX and MS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 1993

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNDX vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBNDX vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBNDXMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.87

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.47

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.82

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.39

12.69

-3.29

LBNDX vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNDX and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBNDXMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.87

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.77

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.85

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.29

+0.80

Drawdowns

LBNDX vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNDXMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-88.12%

+61.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-18.83%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-29.24%

+24.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-32.38%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.77%

-51.33%

+31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-33.72%

+30.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

5.67%

-4.68%

Volatility

LBNDX vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 1.18%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNDXMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

6.58%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

20.69%

-17.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.06%

25.07%

-21.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

28.63%

-23.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

31.48%

-26.44%

Dividends

LBNDX vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than MS's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
6.04%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.86%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNDX and MS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to LBNDX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs MS's -88.12%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNDX and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer