LBAY vs. VOO
LBAY (Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBAY is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. LBAY is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LBAY returned 3.91%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for VOO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBAY charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
LBAY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return.
LBAY
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
LBAY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 6.83% | 4.08% | -3.49% | -8.54% | 22.41% | 22.27% | 4.58% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.34% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBAY and VOO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.32 |
The correlation between LBAY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LBAY vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LBAY
VOO
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
LBAY
VOO
Consumer Defensive
LBAY
VOO
Financial Services
LBAY
VOO
Industrials
LBAY
VOO
Energy
LBAY
VOO
Utilities
LBAY
VOO
Healthcare
LBAY
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
LBAY
VOO
Technology
LBAY
VOO
Real Estate
LBAY
VOO
Communication Services
LBAY
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBAY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
LBAY
VOO
LBAY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 3.23 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 15.03 | -13.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 2.44 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.89 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
LBAY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -33.99% | +18.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -8.90% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | -18.69% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.99% | -24.52% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.34% | -0.32% | -10.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -3.69% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 1.91% | +2.80% |
Volatility
LBAY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that LBAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBAY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.78% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 8.90% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 11.80% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 16.81% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 18.00% | -4.27% |
LBAY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBAY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 3.79% | 3.80% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBAY and VOO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LBAY has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBAY dropped -15.99% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.98% vs 3.91% for LBAY. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.
LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
LBAY is categorized as Long-Short, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for LBAY and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LBAY and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer