LANDM vs. COLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LANDM (Gladstone Land Corporation) and COLD (Americold Realty Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Industrial industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, LANDM returned 4.72%/yr vs -14.39%/yr for COLD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LANDM vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANDM achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than COLD's 15.93% return.

LANDM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.71%
• 1Y: 6.40%
• 3Y*: 6.95%
• 5Y*: 4.72%
• 10Y*: —

COLD

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: 22.67%
• YTD: 15.93%
• 6M: 36.92%
• 1Y: -4.87%
• 3Y*: -17.44%
• 5Y*: -14.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LANDM vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LANDM Gladstone Land Corporation	2.37%	6.29%	9.20%	6.94%	-3.98%	8.20%
COLD Americold Realty Trust	15.93%	-36.17%	-26.72%	10.11%	-10.89%	-3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LANDM and COLD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021	0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap LANDM : $1.02B COLD : $4.18B
EPS LANDM : -$0.31 COLD : -$0.39
PS Ratio LANDM : 10.87 COLD : 1.61
PB Ratio LANDM : 1.49 COLD : 1.48
Total Revenue (TTM) LANDM : $86.33M COLD : $2.60B
Gross Profit (TTM) LANDM : $12.83M COLD : -$101.19M
EBITDA (TTM) LANDM : $64.70M COLD : $311.42M

Return for Risk

LANDM vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LANDM

LANDM Risk / Return Rank: 98
LANDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LANDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LANDM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LANDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LANDM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

COLD

COLD Risk / Return Rank: 35
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 34
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LANDM vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LANDM	COLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	-0.11	+3.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.88	0.17	+5.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	1.02	+1.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.67	-0.12	+12.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	52.27	-0.21	+52.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LANDM vs. COLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANDM Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANDM and COLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LANDM	COLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	-0.11	+3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	-0.44	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.03	+0.61

Drawdowns

LANDM vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANDM drawdown since its inception was -7.96%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANDM and COLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LANDM	COLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-70.76%	+62.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.52%	-41.15%	+40.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.49%	-67.06%	+64.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.96%	-70.76%	+62.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-56.17%	+56.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-22.29%	+20.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	23.24%	-23.11%

Volatility

LANDM vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) is 0.00%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 19.62%. This indicates that LANDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LANDM	COLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	19.62%	-19.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.98%	35.05%	-34.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	44.71%	-42.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.82%	32.92%	-25.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.29%	32.18%	-23.89%

Dividends

LANDM vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

LANDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than COLD's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
COLD Americold Realty Trust	6.30%	7.15%	4.11%	2.91%	3.11%	2.68%	2.25%	2.28%	2.75%
LANDM Gladstone Land Corporation	4.56%	5.02%	5.07%	5.26%	5.34%	4.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LANDM vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Land Corporation and Americold Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LANDM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.

COLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LANDM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.

COLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

LANDM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.

COLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LANDM and COLD in my portfolio?

LANDM and COLD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LANDM or COLD?

COLD has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to LANDM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LANDM dropped -7.96% vs COLD's -70.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LANDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.