PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LANDM vs. COLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LANDM and COLD is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

LANDM vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.83%
-23.54%
LANDM
COLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LANDM:

1.51

COLD:

-0.94

Sortino Ratio

LANDM:

2.15

COLD:

-1.22

Omega Ratio

LANDM:

1.31

COLD:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

LANDM:

4.99

COLD:

-0.56

Martin Ratio

LANDM:

13.37

COLD:

-1.55

Ulcer Index

LANDM:

0.73%

COLD:

15.48%

Daily Std Dev

LANDM:

6.44%

COLD:

25.48%

Max Drawdown

LANDM:

-7.96%

COLD:

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

LANDM:

-1.22%

COLD:

-40.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LANDM:

$408.05M

COLD:

$6.10B

EPS

LANDM:

-$0.11

COLD:

-$1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

LANDM:

$64.12M

COLD:

$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LANDM:

$17.62M

COLD:

$505.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

LANDM:

$43.83M

COLD:

$311.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANDM achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's 0.00% return.


LANDM

YTD

0.05%

1M

0.18%

6M

3.83%

1Y

9.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

COLD

YTD

0.00%

1M

2.83%

6M

-23.54%

1Y

-24.50%

5Y*

-6.92%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LANDM vs. COLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LANDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LANDM is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LANDM is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LANDM is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LANDM is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LANDM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LANDM is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

COLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLD is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLD is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLD is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLD is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLD is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLD is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LANDM vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LANDM, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.51-0.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for LANDM, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.15-1.22
The chart of Omega ratio for LANDM, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.310.85
The chart of Calmar ratio for LANDM, currently valued at 4.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.99-0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for LANDM, currently valued at 13.37, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0013.37-1.55
LANDM
COLD

The current LANDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANDM and COLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.51
-0.94
LANDM
COLD

Dividends

LANDM vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

LANDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than COLD's 4.11% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
LANDM
Gladstone Land Corporation
5.06%5.07%5.25%5.33%4.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
4.11%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.76%

Drawdowns

LANDM vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANDM drawdown since its inception was -7.96%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANDM and COLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.22%
-40.77%
LANDM
COLD

Volatility

LANDM vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDM) is 1.40%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that LANDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.40%
7.05%
LANDM
COLD

Financials

LANDM vs. COLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab