LANC vs. STZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LANC or STZ.
Correlation
The correlation between LANC and STZ is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LANC vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LANC:
0.42
STZ:
-0.13
LANC:
0.75
STZ:
-0.04
LANC:
1.11
STZ:
0.99
LANC:
0.47
STZ:
-0.16
LANC:
1.26
STZ:
-0.32
LANC:
9.11%
STZ:
7.72%
LANC:
27.32%
STZ:
19.44%
LANC:
-54.67%
STZ:
-75.45%
LANC:
-15.80%
STZ:
-15.75%
Fundamentals
LANC:
$5.22B
STZ:
$42.31B
LANC:
$5.78
STZ:
$3.12
LANC:
32.74
STZ:
74.71
LANC:
8.47
STZ:
1.22
LANC:
$1.88B
STZ:
$7.72B
LANC:
$434.32M
STZ:
$3.91B
LANC:
$261.62M
STZ:
$715.30M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LANC achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, LANC has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of 8.97%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.
LANC
9.10%
-3.98%
-3.64%
11.46%
4.15%
8.97%
STZ
-4.86%
-5.55%
-13.90%
-3.31%
5.48%
9.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LANC vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LANC vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
LANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than STZ's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LANC Lancaster Colony Corporation | 2.05% | 2.07% | 1.65% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 1.66% | 1.39% | 1.74% | 1.45% | 5.96% | 1.90% | 1.84% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 1.73% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LANC vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LANC drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANC and STZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LANC vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 6.34%. This indicates that LANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LANC vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities