PortfoliosLab logo
LANC vs. STZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LANC and STZ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LANC vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LANC:

-0.21

STZ:

-0.90

Sortino Ratio

LANC:

-0.09

STZ:

-1.06

Omega Ratio

LANC:

0.99

STZ:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

LANC:

-0.30

STZ:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

LANC:

-0.77

STZ:

-1.28

Ulcer Index

LANC:

9.42%

STZ:

20.17%

Daily Std Dev

LANC:

32.08%

STZ:

29.28%

Max Drawdown

LANC:

-54.67%

STZ:

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

LANC:

-20.44%

STZ:

-99.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LANC:

$4.57B

STZ:

$31.99B

EPS

LANC:

$6.19

STZ:

-$0.45

PEG Ratio

LANC:

8.47

STZ:

1.25

PS Ratio

LANC:

2.42

STZ:

3.13

PB Ratio

LANC:

4.56

STZ:

4.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

LANC:

$1.89B

STZ:

$10.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LANC:

$447.17M

STZ:

$5.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

LANC:

$284.89M

STZ:

$774.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANC achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LANC has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 8.98%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.


LANC

YTD

-2.83%

1M

2.84%

6M

-9.01%

1Y

-6.68%

3Y*

13.37%

5Y*

3.69%

10Y*

8.98%

STZ

YTD

-18.40%

1M

-4.93%

6M

-25.15%

1Y

-26.25%

3Y*

-8.64%

5Y*

2.20%

10Y*

5.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lancaster Colony Corporation

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LANC vs. STZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LANC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LANC is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LANC is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LANC is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LANC is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LANC is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LANC is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

STZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STZ is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STZ is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STZ is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STZ is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STZ is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STZ is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LANC vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LANC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANC and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LANC vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

LANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than STZ's 2.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LANC
Lancaster Colony Corporation
2.21%2.11%2.07%1.65%1.84%1.55%1.66%1.39%1.74%1.45%5.96%1.90%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.27%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%

Drawdowns

LANC vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANC drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANC and STZ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LANC vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 6.73%. This indicates that LANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LANC vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
457.84M
2.16B
(LANC) Total Revenue
(STZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LANC vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
23.1%
51.5%
(LANC) Gross Margin
(STZ) Gross Margin
LANC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported a gross profit of 105.96M and revenue of 457.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.1%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

LANC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported an operating income of 49.88M and revenue of 457.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -150.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

LANC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported a net income of 41.12M and revenue of 457.84M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -375.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.