PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LANC vs. STZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LANCSTZ
YTD Return15.18%5.22%
1Y Return-8.55%11.71%
3Y Return (Ann)3.06%3.21%
5Y Return (Ann)6.91%5.46%
10Y Return (Ann)10.62%13.42%
Sharpe Ratio-0.260.68
Daily Std Dev27.00%17.74%
Max Drawdown-54.67%-81.94%
Current Drawdown-11.11%-6.83%

Fundamentals


LANCSTZ
Market Cap$5.15B$47.58B
EPS$4.69$9.39
PE Ratio39.8827.69
PEG Ratio8.472.21
Revenue (TTM)$1.87B$9.96B
Gross Profit (TTM)$388.57M$4.71B
EBITDA (TTM)$244.10M$3.59B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LANC and STZ is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LANC vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LANC achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LANC has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of 10.62%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10,000.00%11,000.00%12,000.00%13,000.00%14,000.00%15,000.00%16,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
12,253.36%
14,997.69%
LANC
STZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lancaster Colony Corporation

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LANC vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LANC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LANC, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LANC, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LANC, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LANC, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LANC, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.42
STZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STZ, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STZ, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.61

LANC vs. STZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANC Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LANC and STZ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.26
0.68
LANC
STZ

Dividends

LANC vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

LANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than STZ's 1.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LANC
Lancaster Colony Corporation
1.83%2.07%1.65%1.84%1.55%1.66%1.39%1.74%1.45%5.96%1.90%1.84%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
1.40%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LANC vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANC drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -81.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANC and STZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-11.11%
-6.83%
LANC
STZ

Volatility

LANC vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 4.87%. This indicates that LANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.24%
4.87%
LANC
STZ

Financials

LANC vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items