PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LANC vs. STZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LANC vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.04%
-2.74%
LANC
STZ

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANC achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LANC has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of 9.63%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


LANC

YTD

13.63%

1M

5.85%

6M

2.04%

1Y

11.86%

5Y (annualized)

5.47%

10Y (annualized)

9.63%

STZ

YTD

0.74%

1M

-0.31%

6M

-2.74%

1Y

1.88%

5Y (annualized)

7.34%

10Y (annualized)

11.26%

Fundamentals


LANCSTZ
Market Cap$4.95B$43.66B
EPS$5.78$3.12
PE Ratio31.0676.84
PEG Ratio8.471.26
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.88B$10.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)$434.32M$5.18B
EBITDA (TTM)$261.62M$1.58B

Key characteristics


LANCSTZ
Sharpe Ratio0.440.10
Sortino Ratio0.770.26
Omega Ratio1.121.03
Calmar Ratio0.480.13
Martin Ratio1.340.27
Ulcer Index8.82%6.93%
Daily Std Dev27.15%19.20%
Max Drawdown-54.67%-75.45%
Current Drawdown-12.31%-10.80%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LANC and STZ is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LANC vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LANC, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.440.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for LANC, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.770.26
The chart of Omega ratio for LANC, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.121.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for LANC, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.480.13
The chart of Martin ratio for LANC, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.340.27
LANC
STZ

The current LANC Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANC and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.80JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.44
0.10
LANC
STZ

Dividends

LANC vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

LANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than STZ's 1.64% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LANC
Lancaster Colony Corporation
1.93%2.07%1.65%1.84%1.55%1.66%1.39%1.74%1.45%5.96%1.90%1.84%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
1.64%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LANC vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANC drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANC and STZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.31%
-10.80%
LANC
STZ

Volatility

LANC vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 5.92%. This indicates that LANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.65%
5.92%
LANC
STZ

Financials

LANC vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items