PortfoliosLab logo
LANC vs. PPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LANC and PPC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LANC vs. PPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LANC:

-0.21

PPC:

1.59

Sortino Ratio

LANC:

-0.09

PPC:

1.91

Omega Ratio

LANC:

0.99

PPC:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

LANC:

-0.30

PPC:

3.11

Martin Ratio

LANC:

-0.77

PPC:

7.15

Ulcer Index

LANC:

9.42%

PPC:

7.51%

Daily Std Dev

LANC:

32.08%

PPC:

35.05%

Max Drawdown

LANC:

-54.67%

PPC:

-99.64%

Current Drawdown

LANC:

-20.44%

PPC:

-9.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LANC:

$4.62B

PPC:

$11.66B

EPS

LANC:

$6.21

PPC:

$5.10

PE Ratio

LANC:

26.96

PPC:

9.64

PEG Ratio

LANC:

8.47

PPC:

0.49

PS Ratio

LANC:

2.45

PPC:

0.65

PB Ratio

LANC:

4.63

PPC:

3.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

LANC:

$1.89B

PPC:

$17.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LANC:

$447.17M

PPC:

$2.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

LANC:

$284.89M

PPC:

$2.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANC achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly lower than PPC's 22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LANC has underperformed PPC with an annualized return of 8.98%, while PPC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


LANC

YTD

-2.83%

1M

4.23%

6M

-9.01%

1Y

-7.93%

3Y*

13.37%

5Y*

3.69%

10Y*

8.98%

PPC

YTD

22.23%

1M

5.16%

6M

7.50%

1Y

54.41%

3Y*

18.53%

5Y*

21.83%

10Y*

9.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lancaster Colony Corporation

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LANC vs. PPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LANC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LANC is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LANC is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LANC is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LANC is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LANC is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LANC is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PPC is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PPC is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PPC is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PPC is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PPC is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PPC is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LANC vs. PPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LANC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the PPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANC and PPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LANC vs. PPC - Dividend Comparison

LANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than PPC's 12.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LANC
Lancaster Colony Corporation
2.21%2.11%2.07%1.65%1.84%1.55%1.66%1.39%1.74%1.45%5.96%1.90%
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
12.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.48%26.12%0.00%

Drawdowns

LANC vs. PPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANC drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, smaller than the maximum PPC drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANC and PPC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LANC vs. PPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) is 7.39%, while Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) has a volatility of 18.11%. This indicates that LANC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LANC vs. PPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
457.84M
4.46B
(LANC) Total Revenue
(PPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LANC vs. PPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
23.1%
12.4%
(LANC) Gross Margin
(PPC) Gross Margin
LANC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported a gross profit of 105.96M and revenue of 457.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.1%.

PPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a gross profit of 554.87M and revenue of 4.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.4%.

LANC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported an operating income of 49.88M and revenue of 457.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

PPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported an operating income of 404.48M and revenue of 4.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

LANC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lancaster Colony Corporation reported a net income of 41.12M and revenue of 457.84M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

PPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a net income of 296.03M and revenue of 4.46B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.