LAMR vs. WB
Compare and contrast key facts about Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Weibo Corporation (WB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LAMR or WB.
Key characteristics
| LAMR | WB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.70% | -17.55% |
| 1Y Return | 38.29% | -26.06% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.81% | -39.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.76% | -26.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.44% | -6.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | -0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.35 | -0.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 0.96 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.74 | -0.24 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.65 | -0.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.25% | 24.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.18% | 51.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.85% | -94.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.94% | -93.13% |
Fundamentals
| LAMR | WB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.31B | $2.11B |
| EPS | $4.96 | $1.29 |
| PE Ratio | 26.00 | 6.41 |
| PEG Ratio | 7.43 | 4.85 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.18B | $1.30B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.42B | $1.02B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.09B | $397.19M |
Correlation
The correlation between LAMR and WB is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LAMR vs. WB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LAMR achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than WB's -17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LAMR has outperformed WB with an annualized return of 14.44%, while WB has yielded a comparatively lower -6.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LAMR vs. WB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Weibo Corporation (WB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LAMR vs. WB - Dividend Comparison
LAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than WB's 10.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 4.13% | 4.70% | 5.30% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 4.30% | 5.28% | 4.47% | 4.49% | 4.58% | 4.66% |
WB Weibo Corporation | 10.00% | 7.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LAMR vs. WB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAMR drawdown since its inception was -91.85%, roughly equal to the maximum WB drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMR and WB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LAMR vs. WB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) is 5.88%, while Weibo Corporation (WB) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that LAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LAMR vs. WB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) and Weibo Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities