LAMR vs. PLD
LAMR (Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)) and PLD (Prologis, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — LAMR in REIT - Specialty, PLD in REIT - Industrial. Over the past 10 years, LAMR returned 14.00%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for PLD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAMR vs. PLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAMR achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than PLD's 11.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAMR having a 14.00% annualized return and PLD not far ahead at 14.55%.
LAMR
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
PLD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
LAMR vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 19.60% | 9.73% | 19.98% | 18.56% | -18.04% | 51.29% | -3.19% | 35.32% | -1.92% | 15.65% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 11.99% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAMR and PLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 1997 | 0.39 |
The correlation between LAMR and PLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LAMR:
$15.18B
PLD:
$135.80B
LAMR:
$5.42
PLD:
$3.88
LAMR:
27.61
PLD:
36.51
LAMR:
6.63
PLD:
15.17
LAMR:
15.46
PLD:
2.54
LAMR:
$2.29B
PLD:
$8.95B
LAMR:
$541.09M
PLD:
$3.88B
LAMR:
$1.02B
PLD:
$7.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAMR vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank
LAMR
PLD
LAMR vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAMR | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.63 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 11.97 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAMR | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.65 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.22 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.33 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
LAMR vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAMR drawdown since its inception was -91.85%, which is greater than PLD's maximum drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMR and PLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAMR | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.85% | -84.70% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | -9.59% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.86% | -31.37% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -43.30% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.79% | -43.30% | -22.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -7.29% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.41% | -17.37% | -9.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 2.90% | +0.77% |
Volatility
LAMR vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison
Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Prologis, Inc. (PLD) at 5.62%. This indicates that LAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAMR | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 5.62% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 14.08% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 21.13% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 26.94% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 26.98% | +7.68% |
Dividends
LAMR vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison
LAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than PLD's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) | 4.35% | 5.10% | 4.64% | 4.70% | 5.30% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 4.30% | 5.28% | 4.47% | 4.49% | 4.58% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.89% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
LAMR vs. PLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAMR vs. PLD - Profitability Comparison
LAMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 528.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
LAMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported an operating income of 146.06M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
LAMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a net income of 101.29M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAMR and PLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAMR has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to PLD (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAMR dropped -91.85% vs PLD's -84.70%.
PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAMR and PLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer