PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAMR vs. PLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LAMRPLD
YTD Return23.70%-11.88%
1Y Return38.29%6.97%
3Y Return (Ann)7.81%-6.11%
5Y Return (Ann)13.76%7.95%
10Y Return (Ann)14.44%14.12%
Sharpe Ratio1.790.32
Sortino Ratio2.350.62
Omega Ratio1.321.08
Calmar Ratio2.740.22
Martin Ratio11.650.72
Ulcer Index3.25%11.23%
Daily Std Dev21.18%25.01%
Max Drawdown-91.85%-84.70%
Current Drawdown-7.94%-28.77%

Fundamentals


LAMRPLD
Market Cap$13.31B$104.43B
EPS$4.96$3.31
PE Ratio26.0034.06
PEG Ratio7.430.53
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.18B$7.89B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.42B$3.95B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.09B$5.87B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LAMR and PLD is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LAMR vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LAMR achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than PLD's -11.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAMR having a 14.44% annualized return and PLD not far behind at 14.12%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.14%
5.24%
LAMR
PLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAMR vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAMR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAMR, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAMR, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LAMR, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAMR, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LAMR, currently valued at 11.65, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.65
PLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLD, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLD, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PLD, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLD, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PLD, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.72

LAMR vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAMR and PLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.79
0.32
LAMR
PLD

Dividends

LAMR vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

LAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than PLD's 3.27% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LAMR
Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)
4.13%4.70%5.30%3.30%3.00%4.30%5.28%4.47%4.49%4.58%4.66%0.00%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
3.27%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%3.07%3.03%

Drawdowns

LAMR vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAMR drawdown since its inception was -91.85%, which is greater than PLD's maximum drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMR and PLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.94%
-28.77%
LAMR
PLD

Volatility

LAMR vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) is 5.88%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that LAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.88%
8.17%
LAMR
PLD

Financials

LAMR vs. PLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items