LAMR vs. PLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD).

Performance

LAMR vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LAMR vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)	1.27%	9.73%	19.98%	18.56%	-18.04%	51.29%	-3.19%	35.32%	-1.92%	15.65%
PLD Prologis, Inc.	4.37%	25.08%	-18.12%	21.58%	-31.33%	72.33%	14.74%	55.87%	-6.25%	25.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAMR : $12.84B PLD : $126.63B
EPS LAMR : $5.79 PLD : $3.56
PE Ratio LAMR : 21.88 PLD : 37.09
PS Ratio LAMR : 5.67 PLD : 14.39
PB Ratio LAMR : 12.53 PLD : 2.38
Total Revenue (TTM) LAMR : $2.27B PLD : $8.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) LAMR : $997.90M PLD : $5.24B
EBITDA (TTM) LAMR : $1.06B PLD : $7.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAMR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LAMR has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 12.68%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.

LAMR

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -6.93%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

PLD

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 4.37%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 22.35%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 14.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LAMR vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAMR

LAMR Risk / Return Rank: 67
LAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
LAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 77

PLD

PLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAMR vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAMR	PLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	0.84	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	1.30	-0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.19	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.08	5.08	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAMR vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAMR and PLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAMR	PLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	0.84	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.26	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.55	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.33	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between LAMR and PLD is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LAMR vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

LAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than PLD's 3.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)	5.13%	5.10%	4.64%	4.70%	5.30%	3.30%	3.00%	4.30%	5.28%	4.47%	4.49%	4.58%
PLD Prologis, Inc.	3.10%	3.16%	3.63%	2.61%	2.80%	1.50%	2.33%	2.38%	3.27%	2.73%	3.18%	3.54%

Drawdowns

LAMR vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAMR drawdown since its inception was -91.85%, which is greater than PLD's maximum drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMR and PLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAMR	PLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.85%	-84.70%	-7.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-20.10%	+8.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.09%	-43.30%	+13.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.79%	-43.30%	-22.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.90%	-13.60%	+5.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.55%	-17.43%	-9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.70%	-1.04%

Volatility

LAMR vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) have volatilities of 6.09% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAMR	PLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	6.09%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	14.75%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.64%	26.65%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.51%	26.85%	-0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.52%	26.93%	+7.59%

Financials

LAMR vs. PLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) and Prologis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LAMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 595.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 2.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

LAMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported an operating income of -575.81M and revenue of 595.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -96.6%.

PLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 852.36M and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.

LAMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a net income of 152.29M and revenue of 595.93M, resulting in a net margin of 25.6%.

PLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in a net margin of 65.8%.