LAD vs. VONG
LAD (Lithia Motors, Inc.) is a stock, while VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, LAD returned 17.64%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for VONG. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAD vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 0.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAD having a 17.64% annualized return and VONG not far behind at 17.43%.
LAD
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- 25.86%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 17.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $191.02M | $133.98M | $103.41M | |
| $121.41M | $148.04M | $174.70M |
LAD vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 16.44% | -6.34% | 9.32% | 62.03% | -30.63% | 1.84% | 100.73% | 94.57% | -31.96% | 18.56% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.39% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAD and VONG is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LAD and VONG has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAD vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
LAD
VONG
LAD vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAD | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 0.50 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 1.48 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAD vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAD | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.17% | -32.72% | -62.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.73% | -16.23% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.79% | -23.27% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.00% | -32.72% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.16% | -32.72% | -28.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.84% | -7.89% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -4.89% | -22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.01% | 5.42% | +9.59% |
Volatility
LAD vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a higher volatility of 21.47% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.45%. This indicates that LAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAD | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.47% | 6.45% | +15.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 14.00% | +16.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 17.45% | +21.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.69% | 21.64% | +18.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 21.01% | +20.48% |
Dividends
LAD vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than VONG's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 0.58% | 0.66% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.79% | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.81% | 1.49% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.71% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAD and VONG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAD has higher volatility (21.47%) compared to VONG (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAD dropped -95.17% vs VONG's -32.72%.
LAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAD and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer