PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAD vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LAD and VONG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LAD vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
29.28%
5.10%
LAD
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAD:

0.61

VONG:

1.74

Sortino Ratio

LAD:

1.16

VONG:

2.30

Omega Ratio

LAD:

1.13

VONG:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

LAD:

0.53

VONG:

2.31

Martin Ratio

LAD:

2.02

VONG:

8.83

Ulcer Index

LAD:

10.49%

VONG:

3.43%

Daily Std Dev

LAD:

34.41%

VONG:

17.44%

Max Drawdown

LAD:

-95.17%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

LAD:

-12.12%

VONG:

-5.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -1.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAD having a 16.77% annualized return and VONG not far behind at 16.73%.


LAD

YTD

-0.55%

1M

-6.60%

6M

29.28%

1Y

25.27%

5Y*

21.14%

10Y*

16.77%

VONG

YTD

-1.49%

1M

-4.37%

6M

5.10%

1Y

30.18%

5Y*

17.57%

10Y*

16.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAD vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAD is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAD is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAD is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAD is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAD is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAD is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAD vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAD, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.611.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAD, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.162.30
The chart of Omega ratio for LAD, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAD, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.532.31
The chart of Martin ratio for LAD, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.002.028.83
LAD
VONG

The current LAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAD and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.61
1.74
LAD
VONG

Dividends

LAD vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than VONG's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LAD
Lithia Motors, Inc.
0.59%0.58%0.58%0.79%0.46%0.42%0.81%1.49%0.93%0.98%0.71%0.70%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.56%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

LAD vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-12.12%
-5.50%
LAD
VONG

Volatility

LAD vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.73%. This indicates that LAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.93%
5.73%
LAD
VONG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab