PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAD vs. GM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAD vs. GM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and General Motors Company (GM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a -10.83% return, which is significantly lower than GM's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LAD has outperformed GM with an annualized return of 16.25%, while GM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.


LAD

1D
0.10%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-10.83%
6M
-13.50%
1Y
-10.45%
3Y*
2.10%
5Y*
-1.21%
10Y*
16.25%

GM

1D
1.44%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-2.69%
1Y
68.39%
3Y*
31.86%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAD vs. GM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAD
Lithia Motors, Inc.
-10.83%-6.34%9.32%62.03%-30.63%1.84%100.73%94.57%-31.96%18.56%
GM
General Motors Company
-0.65%54.24%49.84%7.92%-42.36%40.80%15.16%14.02%-15.06%22.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LAD and GM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010

0.47

The correlation between LAD and GM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAD:

$6.91B

GM:

$73.95B

EPS

LAD:

$28.39

GM:

$2.68

PE Ratio

LAD:

10.40

GM:

30.01

PS Ratio

LAD:

0.20

GM:

0.41

PB Ratio

LAD:

1.08

GM:

1.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAD:

$37.73B

GM:

$184.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAD:

$5.61B

GM:

$11.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAD:

$1.52B

GM:

$13.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAD vs. GM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAD
LAD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GM
GM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAD vs. GM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and General Motors Company (GM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LADGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.38

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

4.30

-4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

10.51

-11.17

LAD vs. GM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the GM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAD and GM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAD vs. GM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than GM's maximum drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and GM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LADGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.17%

-59.96%

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.73%

-16.00%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.79%

-34.02%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.71%

-58.96%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.16%

-59.96%

-1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.20%

-6.47%

-19.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.59%

-21.49%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.87%

6.53%

+9.34%

Volatility

LAD vs. GM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) is 8.76%, while General Motors Company (GM) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that LAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LADGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

10.61%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.98%

24.30%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.21%

35.14%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.62%

36.71%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.96%

37.00%

+3.96%

Dividends

LAD vs. GM - Dividend Comparison

LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than GM's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GM
General Motors Company
0.82%0.70%0.90%1.00%0.54%0.00%0.91%4.15%4.54%3.71%4.36%4.06%
LAD
Lithia Motors, Inc.
0.75%0.66%0.58%0.58%0.79%0.46%0.42%0.81%1.49%0.93%0.98%0.71%

Financials

LAD vs. GM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithia Motors, Inc. and General Motors Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
9.27B
43.62B
(LAD) Total Revenue
(GM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAD vs. GM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lithia Motors, Inc. and General Motors Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
15.3%
11.5%
Portfolio components
LAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 9.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.

GM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported a gross profit of 5.00B and revenue of 43.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

LAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.30M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

GM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

LAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a net income of 100.40M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

GM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported a net income of 2.63B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAD and GM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GM has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to LAD (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAD dropped -95.17% vs GM's -59.96%.

GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAD and GM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer