LAD vs. GM
LAD (Lithia Motors, Inc.) and GM (General Motors Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LAD in Auto & Truck Dealerships, GM in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, LAD returned 17.64%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for GM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAD vs. GM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than GM's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LAD has outperformed GM with an annualized return of 17.64%, while GM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.
LAD
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- 25.86%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
GM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 70.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $784.42M | $603.70M | $635.72M | |
| $191.02M | $133.98M | $103.41M |
LAD vs. GM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 16.44% | -6.34% | 9.32% | 62.03% | -30.63% | 1.84% | 100.73% | 94.57% | -31.96% | 18.56% |
GM General Motors Company | 9.77% | 54.24% | 49.84% | 7.92% | -42.36% | 40.80% | 15.16% | 14.02% | -15.06% | 22.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAD and GM is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.47 |
The correlation between LAD and GM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LAD:
$8.47B
GM:
$80.37B
LAD:
$19.30
GM:
$2.06
LAD:
19.97
GM:
43.23
LAD:
0.24
GM:
0.45
LAD:
1.35
GM:
1.32
LAD:
$37.94B
GM:
$185.53B
LAD:
$5.76B
GM:
$10.64B
LAD:
$1.59B
GM:
$13.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAD vs. GM — Risk / Return Rank
LAD
GM
LAD vs. GM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and General Motors Company (GM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAD | GM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.28 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 9.59 | -7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAD vs. GM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than GM's maximum drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and GM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAD | GM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.17% | -59.96% | -35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.73% | -16.00% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.79% | -29.10% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.00% | -58.96% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.16% | -59.96% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.84% | -1.59% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -21.39% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.01% | 7.13% | +7.88% |
Volatility
LAD vs. GM - Volatility Comparison
Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a higher volatility of 21.47% compared to General Motors Company (GM) at 10.00%. This indicates that LAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAD | GM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.47% | 10.00% | +11.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 23.57% | +6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 33.78% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.69% | 36.74% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 37.03% | +4.46% |
Dividends
LAD vs. GM - Dividend Comparison
LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than GM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM General Motors Company | 0.74% | 0.70% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 4.15% | 4.54% | 3.71% | 4.36% | 4.06% |
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 0.58% | 0.66% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.79% | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.81% | 1.49% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.71% |
Financials
LAD vs. GM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithia Motors, Inc. and General Motors Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAD vs. GM - Profitability Comparison
LAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 9.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
GM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Motors Company reported a gross profit of 3.66B and revenue of 48.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.
LAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.50M and revenue of 9.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
GM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Motors Company reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 48.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
LAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a net income of 3.90M and revenue of 9.79B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
GM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Motors Company reported a net income of 1.27B and revenue of 48.03B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAD and GM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAD has higher volatility (21.47%) compared to GM (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAD dropped -95.17% vs GM's -59.96%.
GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAD and GM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer