LAD vs. AN
LAD (Lithia Motors, Inc.) and AN (AutoNation, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto & Truck Dealerships industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, LAD returned 14.85%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for AN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAD vs. AN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than AN's -7.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAD having a 14.85% annualized return and AN not far behind at 14.65%.
LAD
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -10.41%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -2.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
AN
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -7.86%
- 6M
- -11.24%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
LAD vs. AN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | -12.18% | -6.34% | 9.32% | 62.03% | -30.63% | 1.84% | 100.73% | 94.57% | -31.96% | 18.56% |
AN AutoNation, Inc. | -7.86% | 21.57% | 13.09% | 39.96% | -8.17% | 67.43% | 43.51% | 36.22% | -30.45% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAD and AN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 1996 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, LAD and AN have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LAD:
$6.80B
AN:
$6.60B
LAD:
$28.39
AN:
$18.31
LAD:
10.24
AN:
10.39
LAD:
0.19
AN:
0.26
LAD:
1.06
AN:
2.96
LAD:
$37.73B
AN:
$27.49B
LAD:
$5.61B
AN:
$4.88B
LAD:
$1.52B
AN:
$1.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAD vs. AN — Risk / Return Rank
LAD
AN
LAD vs. AN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and AutoNation, Inc. (AN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAD | AN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.04 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.12 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 0.27 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAD | AN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.10 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.40 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.22 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
LAD vs. AN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than AN's maximum drawdown of -90.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and AN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAD | AN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.17% | -90.15% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.73% | -21.39% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.79% | -29.54% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.71% | -29.54% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.16% | -63.63% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.32% | -16.26% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.60% | -38.68% | +11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.50% | 9.81% | +5.69% |
Volatility
LAD vs. AN - Volatility Comparison
Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to AutoNation, Inc. (AN) at 8.93%. This indicates that LAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAD | AN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 8.93% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 20.57% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.03% | 27.63% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.60% | 36.08% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.94% | 37.05% | +3.89% |
Dividends
LAD vs. AN - Dividend Comparison
LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while AN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AN AutoNation, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAD Lithia Motors, Inc. | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.79% | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.81% | 1.49% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.71% |
Financials
LAD vs. AN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithia Motors, Inc. and AutoNation, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAD vs. AN - Profitability Comparison
LAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 9.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
AN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 6.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
LAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.30M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
AN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported an operating income of 314.30M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
LAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a net income of 100.40M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.
AN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a net income of 205.40M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAD and AN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAD has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to AN (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAD dropped -95.17% vs AN's -90.15%.
AN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAD and AN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer