PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAD vs. AN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAD vs. AN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and AutoNation, Inc. (AN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAD achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than AN's -7.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAD having a 14.85% annualized return and AN not far behind at 14.65%.


LAD

1D
-1.63%
1M
3.27%
YTD
-12.18%
6M
-10.41%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
14.85%

AN

1D
-0.44%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
-7.86%
6M
-11.24%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAD vs. AN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAD
Lithia Motors, Inc.
-12.18%-6.34%9.32%62.03%-30.63%1.84%100.73%94.57%-31.96%18.56%
AN
AutoNation, Inc.
-7.86%21.57%13.09%39.96%-8.17%67.43%43.51%36.22%-30.45%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LAD and AN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 1996

0.48

Over the past year, LAD and AN have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAD:

$6.80B

AN:

$6.60B

EPS

LAD:

$28.39

AN:

$18.31

PE Ratio

LAD:

10.24

AN:

10.39

PS Ratio

LAD:

0.19

AN:

0.26

PB Ratio

LAD:

1.06

AN:

2.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAD:

$37.73B

AN:

$27.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAD:

$5.61B

AN:

$4.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAD:

$1.52B

AN:

$1.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAD vs. AN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAD
LAD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AN
AN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAD vs. AN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) and AutoNation, Inc. (AN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LADANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.04

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.12

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

0.27

-0.82

LAD vs. AN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the AN Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAD and AN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LADANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

0.10

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.40

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.40

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.22

+0.01

Drawdowns

LAD vs. AN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAD drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than AN's maximum drawdown of -90.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAD and AN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LADANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.17%

-90.15%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.73%

-21.39%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.79%

-29.54%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.71%

-29.54%

-22.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.16%

-63.63%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.32%

-16.26%

-11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-38.68%

+11.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

9.81%

+5.69%

Volatility

LAD vs. AN - Volatility Comparison

Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to AutoNation, Inc. (AN) at 8.93%. This indicates that LAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LADANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

8.93%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

20.57%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.03%

27.63%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.60%

36.08%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

37.05%

+3.89%

Dividends

LAD vs. AN - Dividend Comparison

LAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while AN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AN
AutoNation, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LAD
Lithia Motors, Inc.
0.76%0.66%0.58%0.58%0.79%0.46%0.42%0.81%1.49%0.93%0.98%0.71%

Financials

LAD vs. AN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithia Motors, Inc. and AutoNation, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
9.27B
6.55B
(LAD) Total Revenue
(AN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAD vs. AN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lithia Motors, Inc. and AutoNation, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
15.3%
18.5%
Portfolio components
LAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 9.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.

AN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 6.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

LAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.30M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

AN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported an operating income of 314.30M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

LAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lithia Motors, Inc. reported a net income of 100.40M and revenue of 9.27B, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

AN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoNation, Inc. reported a net income of 205.40M and revenue of 6.55B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAD and AN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAD has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to AN (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAD dropped -95.17% vs AN's -90.15%.

AN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAD and AN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer