PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAC vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LACVOO
YTD Return-29.84%6.68%
Daily Std Dev89.01%11.84%
Max Drawdown-67.32%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-61.69%-3.50%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LAC and VOO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LAC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -29.84% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 6.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-34.26%
21.94%
LAC
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lithium Americas Corp.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAC
Sharpe ratio
No data
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.001.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 8.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.54

LAC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

LAC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.38%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

LAC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -67.32%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-61.69%
-3.50%
LAC
VOO

Volatility

LAC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 37.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.55%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
37.48%
3.55%
LAC
VOO