PortfoliosLab logo
LAC vs. ALTM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALTM is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LAC vs. ALTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$618.00M

ALTM:

$6.29B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.22

ALTM:

$0.09

PS Ratio

LAC:

177.97

ALTM:

6.24

PB Ratio

LAC:

0.99

ALTM:

1.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$0.00

ALTM:

$746.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$158.16K

ALTM:

$124.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$35.58M

ALTM:

$46.70M

Returns By Period


LAC

YTD

-5.05%

1M

5.22%

6M

-24.19%

1Y

-36.91%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALTM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lithium Americas Corp.

Arcadium Lithium plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. ALTM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAC is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAC is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAC is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAC is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAC is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAC vs. ALTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LAC vs. ALTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor ALTM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALTM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

LAC vs. ALTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

LAC vs. ALTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Arcadium Lithium plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
-17.00
289.00M
(LAC) Total Revenue
(ALTM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items