PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAC vs. ALTM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALTM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LAC vs. ALTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
21.83%
118.35%
LAC
ALTM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAC:

-0.40

ALTM:

0.40

Sortino Ratio

LAC:

-0.12

ALTM:

1.37

Omega Ratio

LAC:

0.99

ALTM:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

LAC:

-0.39

ALTM:

0.43

Martin Ratio

LAC:

-0.62

ALTM:

1.02

Ulcer Index

LAC:

52.04%

ALTM:

28.81%

Daily Std Dev

LAC:

80.29%

ALTM:

72.73%

Max Drawdown

LAC:

-81.83%

ALTM:

-68.21%

Current Drawdown

LAC:

-73.81%

ALTM:

-18.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$893.17M

ALTM:

$6.27B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.12

ALTM:

$0.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$53.31K

ALTM:

$741.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$149.97K

ALTM:

$239.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$19.65M

ALTM:

$196.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than ALTM's 13.65% return.


LAC

YTD

3.37%

1M

-12.03%

6M

21.83%

1Y

-33.26%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALTM

YTD

13.65%

1M

1.92%

6M

118.35%

1Y

18.02%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. ALTM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAC is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAC is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAC is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAC is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAC is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAC is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAC vs. ALTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.400.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.121.37
The chart of Omega ratio for LAC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.991.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.450.43
The chart of Martin ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.621.02
LAC
ALTM

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the ALTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and ALTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
-0.40
0.40
LAC
ALTM

Dividends

LAC vs. ALTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor ALTM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, which is greater than ALTM's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and ALTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-58.17%
-18.00%
LAC
ALTM

Volatility

LAC vs. ALTM - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) at 1.93%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
15.55%
1.93%
LAC
ALTM

Financials

LAC vs. ALTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Arcadium Lithium plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab