PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
LAC vs. ALTM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

LAC vs. ALTM

Last updated Apr 5, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LAC or ALTM.

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALTM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

LAC vs. ALTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.
-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-58.44%
-14.89%
LAC
ALTM

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$559.84M

ALTM:

$6.29B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.21

ALTM:

$0.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$17.00

ALTM:

$746.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$37.98K

ALTM:

$124.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$35.58M

ALTM:

$46.70M

Returns By Period

LAC

YTD

-13.80%

1M

-9.86%

6M

-5.19%

1Y

-61.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALTM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. ALTM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAC is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAC is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAC is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAC is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAC is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAC is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAC vs. ALTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
LAC: -0.84
ALTM: 0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAC, currently valued at -1.35, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LAC: -1.35
ALTM: 1.60
The chart of Omega ratio for LAC, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LAC: 0.85
ALTM: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
LAC: -0.90
ALTM: 0.49
The chart of Martin ratio for LAC, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
LAC: -1.13
ALTM: 1.46

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30
-0.84
0.49
LAC
ALTM

Dividends

LAC vs. ALTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor ALTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALTM - Drawdown Comparison

-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-65.12%
-17.86%
LAC
ALTM

Volatility

LAC vs. ALTM - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) at 0.00%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.11%
0
LAC
ALTM

Financials

LAC vs. ALTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Arcadium Lithium plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Risk Analysis
DrawdownsExpected ShortfallUlcer IndexValue at RiskClose-to-Close VolatilityParkinson VolatilityGarman Klass VolatilityRogers-Satchell VolatilityYang Zhang Volatility
Optimization
Asset CorrelationsPortfolio OptimizationRisk Parity OptimizationHierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) Optimization
Factor Model
AlphaBeta
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Screeners
ETF ScreenerFund ScreenerStock Screener
Community
Discussions

Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio

DrawdownsExpected ShortfallUlcer IndexValue at RiskClose-to-Close VolatilityParkinson VolatilityGarman Klass VolatilityRogers-Satchell VolatilityYang Zhang Volatility

Asset CorrelationsPortfolio OptimizationRisk Parity OptimizationHierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) Optimization

AlphaBeta

Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios

ETF ScreenerFund ScreenerStock Screener

Discussions
Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceAboutAffiliate Program

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab