PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABD vs. TMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABD vs. TMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -29.83% return, which is significantly lower than TMV's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LABD has underperformed TMV with an annualized return of -56.11%, while TMV has yielded a comparatively higher -0.80% annualized return.


LABD

1D
-4.73%
1M
4.70%
YTD
-29.83%
6M
-31.22%
1Y
-80.27%
3Y*
-49.85%
5Y*
-41.45%
10Y*
-56.11%

TMV

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
4.73%
6M
11.42%
1Y
-4.33%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
19.12%
10Y*
-0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABD vs. TMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
-29.83%-70.07%-21.43%-41.77%-32.68%1.86%-89.75%-70.80%-6.26%-75.67%
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
4.73%-3.75%39.76%-9.69%150.18%0.83%-54.13%-34.22%3.99%-26.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LABD and TMV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.04

The correlation between LABD and TMV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABD vs. TMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABD
LABD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
LABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
LABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TMV
TMV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABD vs. TMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABDTMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.00

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.20

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-0.40

-0.91

LABD vs. TMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABD Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the TMV Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABD and TMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABDTMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

-0.15

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.41

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

-0.02

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.33

-0.22

Drawdowns

LABD vs. TMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum TMV drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and TMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABDTMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-98.96%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.21%

-21.62%

-61.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.31%

-48.49%

-46.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.24%

-48.49%

-49.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-82.31%

-17.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-95.94%

-4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.92%

-86.60%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.36%

11.13%

+50.23%

Volatility

LABD vs. TMV - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) has a higher volatility of 27.46% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) at 8.15%. This indicates that LABD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABDTMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.46%

8.15%

+19.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.67%

19.18%

+42.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.77%

29.12%

+46.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.26%

47.21%

+49.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.93%

44.44%

+51.49%

LABD vs. TMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TMV's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABD vs. TMV - Dividend Comparison

LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than TMV's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
6.45%6.67%4.68%6.13%0.53%0.00%3.94%1.75%0.81%
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
2.62%2.85%3.41%3.87%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.60%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABD and TMV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABD has higher volatility (27.46%) compared to TMV (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -99.99% vs TMV's -98.96%.

On 10-year performance, TMV leads with -0.80% vs -56.11% for LABD. On fees, TMV is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, TMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TMV has performed better with a -0.80% return vs -56.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMV is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for LABD.

LABD has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 2.62% for TMV.

LABD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMV is Leveraged Bonds. LABD tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%), while TMV tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 1.04% for TMV.

TMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABD and TMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer