LAAC vs. LAC

In the year-to-date period, LAAC achieves a -56.96% return, which is significantly lower than LAC's -53.59% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (LAAC) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LAAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is comparable to the LAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAAC and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LAAC nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LAAC drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, smaller than the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAAC and LAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (LAAC) has a higher volatility of 17.53% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 14.84%. This indicates that LAAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.