L0CK.DE vs. CIBR
L0CK.DE (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - L0CK.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Global Digital Security, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, L0CK.DE returned 10.97%/yr vs 17.11%/yr for CIBR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. L0CK.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L0CK.DE is traded in EUR, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L0CK.DE achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.61% return.
L0CK.DE
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 28.83%
- YTD
- 28.61%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L0CK.DE iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.85% | -0.03% | 22.76% | 29.81% | -25.34% | 27.06% | 14.71% | 33.01% | -11.70% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.61% | -0.35% | 26.01% | 35.52% | -21.90% | 28.63% | 38.12% | 31.42% | -16.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between L0CK.DE and CIBR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between L0CK.DE and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
L0CK.DE
CIBR
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (L0CK.DE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L0CK.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.01 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 2.38 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L0CK.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.69 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L0CK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L0CK.DE and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L0CK.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -35.19% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -22.83% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.07% | -24.33% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -28.91% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -3.70% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -8.74% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 9.66% | -4.58% |
Volatility
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (L0CK.DE) is 8.18%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that L0CK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L0CK.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 11.17% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 21.25% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 24.92% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 24.78% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 23.90% | -3.69% |
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
L0CK.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
L0CK.DE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
L0CK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
L0CK.DE iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
L0CK.DE and CIBR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L0CK.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L0CK.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
L0CK.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. L0CK.DE tracks STOXX® Global Digital Security, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for L0CK.DE and 0.60% for CIBR.
Find the right allocation for L0CK.DE and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer