PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L vs. HD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

L vs. HD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loews Corporation (L) and The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than HD's -8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, L has underperformed HD with an annualized return of 10.66%, while HD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.


L

1D
1.06%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
17.30%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
10.66%

HD

1D
0.27%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-8.86%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
-13.20%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
11.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L vs. HD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L
Loews Corporation
-0.25%24.68%22.09%19.78%1.41%28.89%-13.69%15.89%-8.56%8.56%
HD
The Home Depot, Inc.
-8.86%-9.33%15.00%12.77%-21.98%59.51%24.50%30.56%-7.30%44.61%

Correlation

The correlation between L and HD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 1987

0.35

The correlation between L and HD shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

L:

$21.64B

HD:

$310.27B

EPS

L:

$8.96

HD:

$14.08

PE Ratio

L:

11.71

HD:

22.13

PS Ratio

L:

1.20

HD:

1.86

PB Ratio

L:

1.16

HD:

22.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

L:

$18.29B

HD:

$166.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

L:

$8.42B

HD:

$55.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

L:

$2.64B

HD:

$23.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L vs. HD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L
L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HD
HD Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L vs. HD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loews Corporation (L) and The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

-0.56

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

-0.70

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.92

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

-0.46

+2.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

-0.97

+6.95

L vs. HD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the HD Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L and HD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

-0.56

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.10

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.68

-0.35

Drawdowns

L vs. HD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, smaller than the maximum HD drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L and HD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-70.46%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-28.81%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-28.84%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-34.73%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.53%

-37.99%

-10.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-25.49%

+18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-20.60%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

13.73%

-10.75%

Volatility

L vs. HD - Volatility Comparison

Loews Corporation (L) and The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) have volatilities of 7.62% and 7.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

7.94%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

17.69%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

23.45%

-7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

24.05%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

24.82%

+0.82%

Dividends

L vs. HD - Dividend Comparison

L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than HD's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HD
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.96%2.67%2.31%2.41%2.41%1.59%2.26%2.49%2.40%1.88%2.06%1.78%
L
Loews Corporation
0.24%0.24%0.30%0.36%0.43%0.43%0.56%0.48%0.55%1.58%0.53%0.65%

Financials

L vs. HD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loews Corporation and The Home Depot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
4.56B
41.77B
(L) Total Revenue
(HD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

L vs. HD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loews Corporation and The Home Depot, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
52.3%
33.0%
Portfolio components
L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

HD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Home Depot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.78B and revenue of 41.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported an operating income of 539.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

HD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Home Depot, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.98B and revenue of 41.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a net income of 572.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

HD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Home Depot, Inc. reported a net income of 3.29B and revenue of 41.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


L and HD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HD has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to L (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, L dropped -65.58% vs HD's -70.46%.

L currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L and HD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer