KWEB vs. FDN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN).
KWEB and FDN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. FDN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Internet Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2006. Both KWEB and FDN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KWEB or FDN.
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and FDN is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KWEB vs. FDN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KWEB:
0.70
FDN:
1.80
KWEB:
1.32
FDN:
2.35
KWEB:
1.16
FDN:
1.32
KWEB:
0.37
FDN:
1.27
KWEB:
1.96
FDN:
9.22
KWEB:
14.11%
FDN:
3.73%
KWEB:
39.23%
FDN:
19.15%
KWEB:
-80.92%
FDN:
-61.55%
KWEB:
-67.97%
FDN:
-2.99%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FDN's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has underperformed FDN with an annualized return of 0.60%, while FDN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.
KWEB
0.48%
-1.34%
13.10%
28.17%
-9.24%
0.60%
FDN
2.62%
1.25%
25.69%
30.44%
10.99%
15.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KWEB vs. FDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FDN's 0.52% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KWEB vs. FDN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KWEB
FDN
KWEB vs. FDN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KWEB vs. FDN - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 3.49% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. FDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than FDN's maximum drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and FDN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KWEB vs. FDN - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) at 6.22%. This indicates that KWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.