PortfoliosLab logo
KWEB vs. EMQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and EMQQ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KWEB vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KWEB:

0.41

EMQQ:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

KWEB:

0.74

EMQQ:

0.94

Omega Ratio

KWEB:

1.09

EMQQ:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

KWEB:

0.17

EMQQ:

0.23

Martin Ratio

KWEB:

0.83

EMQQ:

1.73

Ulcer Index

KWEB:

14.83%

EMQQ:

8.08%

Daily Std Dev

KWEB:

41.93%

EMQQ:

25.34%

Max Drawdown

KWEB:

-80.92%

EMQQ:

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

KWEB:

-63.12%

EMQQ:

-49.68%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KWEB having a 15.70% return and EMQQ slightly higher at 16.18%. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has underperformed EMQQ with an annualized return of -0.43%, while EMQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.86% annualized return.


KWEB

YTD

15.70%

1M

5.69%

6M

16.72%

1Y

17.11%

3Y*

12.81%

5Y*

-5.03%

10Y*

-0.43%

EMQQ

YTD

16.18%

1M

6.51%

6M

8.91%

1Y

16.84%

3Y*

13.92%

5Y*

1.00%

10Y*

4.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KWEB vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KWEB vs. EMQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KWEB is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KWEB is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KWEB is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KWEB is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KWEB is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KWEB is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMQQ is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMQQ is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMQQ is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMQQ is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMQQ is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMQQ is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KWEB vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KWEB Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the EMQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWEB and EMQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KWEB vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than EMQQ's 1.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
3.03%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%0.89%
EMQQ
Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF
1.46%1.70%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%0.00%

Drawdowns

KWEB vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than EMQQ's maximum drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and EMQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KWEB vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) at 5.11%. This indicates that KWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...