KTEC vs. ASEA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while ASEA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KTEC returned -12.60%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for ASEA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASEA.

Performance

KTEC vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -21.33% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 9.39% return.

KTEC

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -7.85%
• YTD: -21.33%
• 6M: -21.98%
• 1Y: -19.03%
• 3Y*: 3.17%
• 5Y*: -12.60%
• 10Y*: —

ASEA

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 28.84%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 10.48%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-21.33%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	9.39%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	5.24%	0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and ASEA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.42

KTEC vs. ASEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KTEC	ASEA
Consumer Cyclical	45.1%	0.9%
Communication Services	28.2%	4.0%
Technology	24.5%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.3%
Energy	-	3.2%
Financial Services	-	11.3%
Industrials	-	6.3%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

KTEC vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 4
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 65
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KTEC	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	2.02	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	2.90	-3.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.36	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	3.50	-4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	9.40	-10.47

KTEC vs. ASEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and ASEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than ASEA's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and ASEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KTEC	ASEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.90%	-44.16%	-22.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.76%	-8.28%	-26.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.76%	-22.20%	-12.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.90%	-22.20%	-44.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.35%	-2.91%	-47.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-10.63%	-33.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.67%	3.08%	+14.59%

Volatility

KTEC vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 4.52%. This indicates that KTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KTEC	ASEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	4.52%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	11.61%	+9.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.88%	14.37%	+13.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.21%	14.73%	+28.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.05%	17.54%	+25.51%

KTEC vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KTEC vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than ASEA's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.61%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.26%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KTEC and ASEA in my portfolio?

KTEC and ASEA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KTEC or ASEA?

KTEC has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to ASEA (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs ASEA's -44.16%.

Which ETF is better, KTEC or ASEA?

On 5-year performance, ASEA leads with 10.48% vs -12.60% for KTEC. On fees, ASEA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KTEC or ASEA?

Over the 5-year period, ASEA has performed better with a 10.48% return vs -12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KTEC or ASEA?

ASEA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KTEC or ASEA?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.61% for ASEA.

What is the main difference between KTEC and ASEA?

KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while ASEA is Asia Pacific Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.65% for ASEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.