PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTCAX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTCAX achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, KTCAX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 23.59%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.65% annualized return.


KTCAX

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.69%
YTD
25.26%
6M
23.68%
1Y
48.54%
3Y*
35.01%
5Y*
18.08%
10Y*
23.59%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KTCAX
DWS Science and Technology Fund
25.26%21.21%40.51%57.73%-36.66%22.68%46.12%42.35%-1.03%35.79%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KTCAX and SCHG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.94

The correlation between KTCAX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTCAX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTCAX
KTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
KTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KTCAXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.10

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

3.58

+6.62

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTCAX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTCAX drawdown since its inception was -82.20%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTCAX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTCAXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.20%

-34.59%

-47.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-16.41%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

-23.39%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.37%

-34.59%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-34.59%

-7.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-6.46%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-5.20%

-22.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

5.02%

-0.05%

Volatility

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that KTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTCAXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

5.91%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

12.52%

+6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.88%

16.24%

+6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

22.38%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.29%

21.58%

+2.71%

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTCAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTCAX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

KTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KTCAX
DWS Science and Technology Fund
6.65%8.32%10.15%11.73%6.31%10.93%7.36%8.99%14.35%4.50%2.32%11.97%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTCAX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KTCAX has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTCAX dropped -82.20% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

KTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTCAX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer