KTB vs. SNA
KTB (Kontoor Brands, Inc.) and SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) are both stocks. KTB operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while SNA operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, KTB returned 5.14%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for SNA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KTB vs. SNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTB achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than SNA's 10.97% return.
KTB
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SNA
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
KTB vs. SNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. | 12.37% | -26.31% | 40.69% | 62.60% | -18.25% | 30.25% | -0.90% | 6.87% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 10.97% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTB and SNA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between KTB and SNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
KTB:
$3.82B
SNA:
$19.89B
KTB:
$4.94
SNA:
$19.35
KTB:
13.80
SNA:
19.51
KTB:
2.39
SNA:
2.96
KTB:
1.22
SNA:
3.90
KTB:
6.17
SNA:
3.34
KTB:
$3.14B
SNA:
$5.12B
KTB:
$1.50B
SNA:
$2.63B
KTB:
$460.63M
SNA:
$1.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTB vs. SNA — Risk / Return Rank
KTB
SNA
KTB vs. SNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and Snap-on Incorporated (SNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTB | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 2.46 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 6.13 | -5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTB | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.99 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.47 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.41 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
KTB vs. SNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTB drawdown since its inception was -67.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SNA drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTB and SNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTB | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.20% | -65.76% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.91% | -8.47% | -24.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.92% | -20.77% | -24.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.91% | -22.65% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.04% | -2.76% | -23.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.43% | -13.88% | -8.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.73% | 3.40% | +13.33% |
Volatility
KTB vs. SNA - Volatility Comparison
Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) has a higher volatility of 16.35% compared to Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) at 6.90%. This indicates that KTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTB | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.35% | 6.90% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.82% | 14.63% | +22.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.15% | 21.17% | +27.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.83% | 23.91% | +19.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 27.18% | +23.19% |
Dividends
KTB vs. SNA - Dividend Comparison
KTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than SNA's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. | 3.08% | 3.42% | 2.37% | 3.11% | 4.65% | 3.24% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Financials
KTB vs. SNA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kontoor Brands, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KTB vs. SNA - Profitability Comparison
KTB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kontoor Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 329.37M and revenue of 613.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 608.30M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.
KTB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kontoor Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.11M and revenue of 613.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 250.80M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
KTB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kontoor Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 92.44M and revenue of 613.32M, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KTB and SNA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KTB has higher volatility (16.35%) compared to SNA (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTB dropped -67.20% vs SNA's -65.76%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KTB and SNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer