PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSHTY vs. XIACY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kuaishou Technology (KSHTY) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSHTY achieves a -32.01% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -34.34% return.


KSHTY

1D
-5.22%
1M
-1.23%
6M
-45.00%
YTD
-32.01%
1Y
-34.85%
3Y*
-6.20%
5Y*
10Y*

XIACY

1D
3.70%
1M
-0.60%
6M
-32.07%
YTD
-34.34%
1Y
-54.77%
3Y*
33.51%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KSHTY
Kuaishou Technology
-32.01%49.65%-22.89%-14.46%-17.00%-31.03%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-34.34%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-28.29%

Correlation

The correlation between KSHTY and XIACY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KSHTY:

$23.38B

XIACY:

$85.33B

EPS

KSHTY:

CN¥0.79

XIACY:

CN¥6.66

PE Ratio

KSHTY:

9.35

XIACY:

16.85

PEG Ratio

KSHTY:

0.12

XIACY:

0.11

PS Ratio

KSHTY:

1.14

XIACY:

1.34

PB Ratio

KSHTY:

1.98

XIACY:

2.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

KSHTY:

CN¥142.95B

XIACY:

CN¥442.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KSHTY:

CN¥77.12B

XIACY:

CN¥97.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

KSHTY:

CN¥24.64B

XIACY:

CN¥40.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSHTY vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSHTY
KSHTY Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KSHTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSHTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSHTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
KSHTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSHTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kuaishou Technology (KSHTY) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSHTYXIACYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.74

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.86

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-1.48

+0.54

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSHTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSHTY and XIACY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSHTY drawdown since its inception was -70.85%, roughly equal to the maximum XIACY drawdown of -71.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSHTY and XIACY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSHTYXIACYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.85%

-71.03%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.14%

-63.59%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.56%

-64.97%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.58%

-58.11%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-39.63%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.00%

36.73%

+0.27%

Volatility

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

Kuaishou Technology (KSHTY) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) at 12.59%. This indicates that KSHTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSHTYXIACYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

12.59%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.61%

28.28%

+32.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.29%

38.40%

+56.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.81%

46.59%

+52.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.81%

46.48%

+52.33%

Dividends

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

KSHTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
KSHTY
Kuaishou Technology
2.70%0.72%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
0.00%0.00%

Financials

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kuaishou Technology and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.51B
98.54B
(KSHTY) Total Revenue
(XIACY) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

KSHTY vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kuaishou Technology and Xiaomi Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.2%
22.0%
Portfolio components
KSHTY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kuaishou Technology reported a gross profit of 17.14B and revenue of 33.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

KSHTY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kuaishou Technology reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 33.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

KSHTY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kuaishou Technology reported a net income of 2.89B and revenue of 33.51B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KSHTY and XIACY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSHTY has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to XIACY (12.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSHTY dropped -70.85% vs XIACY's -71.03%.

KSHTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSHTY and XIACY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer