PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMD vs. UFPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRMD vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMD achieves a -32.53% return, which is significantly lower than UFPT's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KRMD has outperformed UFPT with an annualized return of 28.68%, while UFPT has yielded a comparatively lower 26.33% annualized return.


KRMD

1D
-3.21%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-32.53%
6M
-31.47%
1Y
38.03%
3Y*
-0.67%
5Y*
-3.93%
10Y*
28.68%

UFPT

1D
0.91%
1M
13.39%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
-8.60%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
30.45%
10Y*
26.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMD vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRMD
Repro Med Systems, Inc.
-32.53%50.91%56.82%-31.23%19.00%-50.17%-7.81%295.76%32.00%150.00%
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
-1.66%-9.19%42.12%45.93%67.79%50.77%-6.07%65.15%8.06%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMD and UFPT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 1996

0.05

The correlation between KRMD and UFPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRMD:

$181.75M

UFPT:

$1.70B

EPS

KRMD:

-$0.05

UFPT:

$8.81

PS Ratio

KRMD:

4.19

UFPT:

2.79

PB Ratio

KRMD:

10.74

UFPT:

3.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRMD:

$43.26M

UFPT:

$608.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRMD:

$25.98M

UFPT:

$172.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

KRMD:

-$1.51M

UFPT:

$111.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMD vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMD
KRMD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
KRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

UFPT
UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMD vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRMDUFPTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

-0.20

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

0.01

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.28

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.85

-0.52

+2.37

KRMD vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMD and UFPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRMDUFPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

-0.20

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.69

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.67

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.16

-0.08

Drawdowns

KRMD vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMD drawdown since its inception was -97.69%, which is greater than UFPT's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMD and UFPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMDUFPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.69%

-88.53%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.26%

-30.69%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.96%

-48.31%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

-48.31%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.30%

-48.31%

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.44%

-39.08%

-29.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.13%

-32.24%

-26.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.62%

16.69%

+3.93%

Volatility

KRMD vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) at 13.49%. This indicates that KRMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMDUFPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

13.49%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.08%

30.17%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.54%

43.48%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.44%

44.20%

+16.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.65%

39.60%

+31.05%

Dividends

KRMD vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KRMD nor UFPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KRMD vs. UFPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
11.76M
154.20M
(KRMD) Total Revenue
(UFPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRMD vs. UFPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
61.5%
28.8%
Portfolio components
KRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.23M and revenue of 11.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

KRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of -667.39K and revenue of 11.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

KRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -807.08K and revenue of 11.76M, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRMD and UFPT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRMD has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to UFPT (13.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMD dropped -97.69% vs UFPT's -88.53%.

KRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMD and UFPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer