KRMD vs. UFPT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT).

Performance

KRMD vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KRMD vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KRMD Repro Med Systems, Inc.	-26.51%	50.91%	56.82%	-31.23%	19.00%	-50.17%	-7.81%	295.76%	32.00%	150.00%
UFPT UFP Technologies, Inc.	-12.63%	-9.19%	42.12%	45.93%	67.79%	50.77%	-6.07%	65.15%	8.06%	9.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KRMD : $197.22M UFPT : $1.51B
EPS KRMD : -$0.06 UFPT : $8.77
PS Ratio KRMD : 4.80 UFPT : 2.51
PB Ratio KRMD : 11.57 UFPT : 3.57
Total Revenue (TTM) KRMD : $41.13M UFPT : $602.80M
Gross Profit (TTM) KRMD : $25.60M UFPT : $170.41M
EBITDA (TTM) KRMD : -$1.85M UFPT : $92.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMD achieves a -26.51% return, which is significantly lower than UFPT's -12.63% return. Over the past 10 years, KRMD has outperformed UFPT with an annualized return of 28.80%, while UFPT has yielded a comparatively lower 23.84% annualized return.

KRMD

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: -26.51%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 70.12%
• 3Y*: 0.39%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 28.80%

UFPT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: -12.63%
• 6M: -2.79%
• 1Y: -4.87%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 29.83%
• 10Y*: 23.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KRMD vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMD

KRMD Risk / Return Rank: 76
KRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
KRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
KRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
KRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
KRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

UFPT

UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 35
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMD vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRMD	UFPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	-0.11	+1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	0.17	+1.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.02	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	-0.13	+2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	-0.27	+4.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRMD vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMD and UFPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRMD	UFPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	-0.11	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.68	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.61	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.16	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between KRMD and UFPT is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KRMD vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KRMD nor UFPT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KRMD vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMD drawdown since its inception was -97.69%, which is greater than UFPT's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMD and UFPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRMD	UFPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.69%	-88.53%	-9.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.43%	-30.20%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.29%	-48.31%	-10.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.30%	-48.31%	-35.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.62%	-45.88%	-19.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.09%	-32.19%	-26.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.45%	14.20%	+0.25%

Volatility

KRMD vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) at 8.84%. This indicates that KRMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRMD	UFPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.19%	8.84%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.00%	32.02%	+3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.77%	45.90%	+13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.31%	43.82%	+17.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.07%	39.36%	+31.71%

Financials

KRMD vs. UFPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.82M and revenue of 10.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.97M and revenue of 148.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

KRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.92K and revenue of 10.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.50M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

KRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -486.86K and revenue of 10.90M, resulting in a net margin of -4.5%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.57M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.