PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMD vs. UFPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRMD vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMD achieves a -29.26% return, which is significantly lower than UFPT's 14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, KRMD has underperformed UFPT with an annualized return of 23.80%, while UFPT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.61% annualized return.


KRMD

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.46%
6M
-23.75%
YTD
-29.26%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
23.80%
ALL TIME*
11.77%

UFPT

1D
-0.10%
1M
-6.45%
6M
1.45%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
12.45%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
33.64%
10Y*
26.61%
ALL TIME*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$645.21K$536.52K$587.45K
$43.21M$52.84M$50.76M

KRMD vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRMD
Repro Med Systems, Inc.
-29.26%50.91%56.82%-31.23%19.00%-50.17%-7.81%295.76%32.00%150.00%
UFPT
UFP Technologies, Inc.
14.75%-9.19%42.12%45.93%67.79%50.77%-6.07%65.15%8.06%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMD and UFPT is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 1996

0.06

The correlation between KRMD and UFPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRMD:

$188.78M

UFPT:

$1.97B

EPS

KRMD:

-$0.05

UFPT:

$8.80

PS Ratio

KRMD:

4.40

UFPT:

3.26

PB Ratio

KRMD:

11.26

UFPT:

4.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRMD:

$43.26M

UFPT:

$608.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRMD:

$25.98M

UFPT:

$172.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

KRMD:

-$1.51M

UFPT:

$111.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMD vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KRMD
KRMD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UFPT
UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KRMD vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRMDUFPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.09

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

0.80

-0.05

KRMD vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMD and UFPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRMD vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMD drawdown since its inception was -97.69%, which is greater than UFPT's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMD and UFPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMDUFPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.69%

-88.53%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.79%

-30.69%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.96%

-48.31%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.96%

-48.31%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.30%

-48.31%

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.91%

-28.92%

-37.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.17%

-32.24%

-26.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.10%

15.78%

+9.32%

Volatility

KRMD vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Repro Med Systems, Inc. (KRMD) is 12.11%, while UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that KRMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMDUFPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.11%

15.03%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.60%

32.45%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.23%

44.60%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.85%

44.69%

+15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.44%

39.75%

+28.69%

Dividends

KRMD vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KRMD nor UFPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KRMD vs. UFPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KRMD vs. UFPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and UFP Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.23M and revenue of 11.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

KRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of -667.39K and revenue of 11.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

KRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Repro Med Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -807.08K and revenue of 11.76M, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRMD and UFPT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFPT has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to KRMD (12.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMD dropped -97.69% vs UFPT's -88.53%.

KRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMD and UFPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer