PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KRG vs. REG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


KRGREG
YTD Return25.57%13.93%
1Y Return37.81%27.60%
3Y Return (Ann)12.53%3.91%
5Y Return (Ann)13.54%7.01%
10Y Return (Ann)5.91%5.88%
Sharpe Ratio1.811.60
Sortino Ratio2.682.39
Omega Ratio1.321.28
Calmar Ratio0.971.52
Martin Ratio7.054.12
Ulcer Index5.53%7.24%
Daily Std Dev21.57%18.64%
Max Drawdown-88.63%-73.38%
Current Drawdown-15.02%-1.03%

Fundamentals


KRGREG
Market Cap$6.14B$13.51B
EPS-$0.04$2.12
PEG Ratio0.004.96
Total Revenue (TTM)$830.77M$1.44B
Gross Profit (TTM)$417.71M$713.17M
EBITDA (TTM)$448.21M$909.45M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between KRG and REG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

KRG vs. REG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KRG achieves a 25.57% return, which is significantly higher than REG's 13.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KRG having a 5.91% annualized return and REG not far behind at 5.88%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
33.68%
26.27%
KRG
REG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KRG vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KRG, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KRG, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KRG, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KRG, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KRG, currently valued at 7.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.05
REG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for REG, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for REG, currently valued at 4.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.12

KRG vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the REG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRG and REG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.81
1.60
KRG
REG

Dividends

KRG vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

KRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than REG's 3.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KRG
Kite Realty Group Trust
3.68%4.20%3.90%3.12%3.00%8.13%9.01%6.17%4.83%4.16%3.55%3.65%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.62%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%2.95%4.00%

Drawdowns

KRG vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRG drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than REG's maximum drawdown of -73.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRG and REG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-15.02%
-1.03%
KRG
REG

Volatility

KRG vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.24%. This indicates that KRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.53%
4.24%
KRG
REG

Financials

KRG vs. REG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kite Realty Group Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items