KRG vs. REG
KRG (Kite Realty Group Trust) and REG (Regency Centers Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Retail industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, KRG returned 5.62%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for REG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KRG vs. REG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRG achieves a 23.51% return, which is significantly higher than REG's 18.04% return. Over the past 10 years, KRG has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 5.62%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.
KRG
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- YTD
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
REG
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
KRG vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 23.51% | -0.20% | 15.46% | 13.60% | 0.80% | 50.80% | -20.03% | 53.21% | -22.48% | -11.52% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.04% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRG and REG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2004 | 0.67 |
The correlation between KRG and REG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KRG:
$5.78B
REG:
$14.64B
KRG:
$1.34
REG:
$3.55
KRG:
21.21
REG:
22.55
KRG:
0.01
REG:
2.21
KRG:
7.35
REG:
8.59
KRG:
2.05
REG:
2.20
KRG:
$826.57M
REG:
$1.70B
KRG:
$431.97M
REG:
$814.76M
KRG:
$719.77M
REG:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRG vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank
KRG
REG
KRG vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRG | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 2.46 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.18 | 6.10 | +4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRG vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRG drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than REG's maximum drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRG and REG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRG | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -73.37% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.27% | -8.17% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.07% | -15.10% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.07% | -30.09% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.62% | -57.02% | -11.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -2.29% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -16.14% | -29.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.29% | -0.03% |
Volatility
KRG vs. REG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is 5.12%, while Regency Centers Corporation (REG) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that KRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRG | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 5.58% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 11.63% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 16.35% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 22.34% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.85% | 29.89% | +6.96% |
Dividends
KRG vs. REG - Dividend Comparison
KRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than REG's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 4.52% | 4.51% | 4.00% | 4.20% | 3.90% | 3.12% | 3.00% | 8.13% | 9.01% | 6.17% | 4.83% | 4.16% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.72% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
KRG vs. REG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kite Realty Group Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KRG vs. REG - Profitability Comparison
KRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a gross profit of 144.76M and revenue of 200.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
REG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 76.40M and revenue of 413.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
KRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported an operating income of 130.81M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.2%.
REG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 152.73M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
KRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a net income of 11.39M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
REG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 128.55M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KRG and REG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REG has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to KRG (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRG dropped -88.63% vs REG's -73.37%.
KRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRG and REG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer