KREF vs. PFLT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KREF (KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.) and PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.) are both stocks. KREF operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while PFLT operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, KREF returned -11.60%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for PFLT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KREF vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KREF achieves a -14.22% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -7.87% return.

KREF

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: -14.22%
• 6M: -14.32%
• 1Y: -14.64%
• 3Y*: -6.64%
• 5Y*: -11.60%
• 10Y*: —

PFLT

• 1D: -3.48%
• 1M: -11.26%
• YTD: -7.87%
• 6M: -8.24%
• 1Y: -9.99%
• 3Y*: 2.12%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: 6.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KREF vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KREF KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.	-14.22%	-9.25%	-15.80%	9.15%	-25.89%	27.86%	-2.82%	16.15%	4.26%	-5.19%
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.	-7.87%	-4.17%	0.62%	23.05%	-5.53%	32.64%	-1.41%	15.52%	-8.29%	4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between KREF and PFLT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2017	0.43

Fundamentals

EPS KREF : -$1.58 PFLT : $1.69
PS Ratio KREF : 1.22 PFLT : 2.45
Total Revenue (TTM) KREF : $366.11M PFLT : $229.78M
Gross Profit (TTM) KREF : $298.61M PFLT : $45.40M
EBITDA (TTM) KREF : $197.55M PFLT : $38.59M

Return for Risk

KREF vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KREF

KREF Risk / Return Rank: 21
KREF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
KREF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KREF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KREF Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KREF Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PFLT

PFLT Risk / Return Rank: 21
PFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KREF vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KREF	PFLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	-0.51	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.53	-0.58	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.93	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.46	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	-0.88	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KREF vs. PFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KREF Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is comparable to the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KREF and PFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KREF	PFLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	-0.51	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	0.08	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.25	-0.34

Drawdowns

KREF vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KREF drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KREF and PFLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KREF	PFLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.33%	-69.77%	+12.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.53%	-21.90%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.87%	-22.96%	-21.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.33%	-29.64%	-27.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-69.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.67%	-17.83%	-32.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.51%	-8.07%	-11.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.45%	11.33%	+6.12%

Volatility

KREF vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 5.73%. This indicates that KREF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KREF	PFLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	5.73%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.23%	16.05%	+8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.06%	19.85%	+9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.88%	21.11%	+8.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.64%	28.91%	+1.73%

Dividends

KREF vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

KREF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.77%, less than PFLT's 15.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KREF KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.	14.77%	12.17%	9.90%	13.00%	12.32%	9.53%	9.60%	8.42%	8.83%	4.95%	0.00%	0.00%
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.	15.28%	13.27%	11.25%	9.98%	10.38%	8.93%	10.83%	9.24%	9.59%	8.31%	8.08%	10.04%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KREF and PFLT in my portfolio?

KREF and PFLT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KREF or PFLT?

KREF has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to PFLT (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KREF dropped -57.33% vs PFLT's -69.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.