PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KR vs. MGV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KR and MGV is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

KR vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.30%
7.01%
KR
MGV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KR:

1.25

MGV:

2.08

Sortino Ratio

KR:

2.15

MGV:

2.93

Omega Ratio

KR:

1.24

MGV:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

KR:

2.00

MGV:

3.07

Martin Ratio

KR:

5.14

MGV:

9.57

Ulcer Index

KR:

5.51%

MGV:

2.27%

Daily Std Dev

KR:

22.78%

MGV:

10.40%

Max Drawdown

KR:

-74.33%

MGV:

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

KR:

-7.80%

MGV:

-2.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 9.80%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


KR

YTD

-4.56%

1M

-4.16%

6M

8.30%

1Y

29.42%

5Y*

22.54%

10Y*

9.80%

MGV

YTD

3.07%

1M

4.02%

6M

7.01%

1Y

21.23%

5Y*

10.68%

10Y*

10.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KR vs. MGV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KR is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KR is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KR is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KR is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KR is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KR is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGV is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGV is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGV is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGV is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGV is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGV is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KR vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KR, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.252.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for KR, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.152.93
The chart of Omega ratio for KR, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.241.37
The chart of Calmar ratio for KR, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.003.07
The chart of Martin ratio for KR, currently valued at 5.14, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.149.57
KR
MGV

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and MGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.25
2.08
KR
MGV

Dividends

KR vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than MGV's 2.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.09%2.00%2.41%17.47%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%1.06%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
2.24%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%2.26%

Drawdowns

KR vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -74.33%, which is greater than MGV's maximum drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.80%
-2.98%
KR
MGV

Volatility

KR vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 4.19%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.47%
4.19%
KR
MGV
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab