PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOF vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KOF vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOF achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 62.36% return. Over the past 10 years, KOF has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 7.21%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 31.52% annualized return.


KOF

1D
-1.04%
1M
6.35%
YTD
14.84%
6M
22.36%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
21.49%
10Y*
7.21%

CAT

1D
1.80%
1M
5.88%
YTD
62.36%
6M
57.25%
1Y
167.95%
3Y*
62.31%
5Y*
32.93%
10Y*
31.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOF vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.
14.84%27.03%-14.60%45.09%29.83%24.85%-19.17%2.46%-9.99%12.36%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
62.36%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%75.03%

Correlation

The correlation between KOF and CAT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 1993

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KOF:

$180.89B

CAT:

$431.41B

EPS

KOF:

$43.46

CAT:

$20.07

PE Ratio

KOF:

2.48

CAT:

46.14

PS Ratio

KOF:

0.19

CAT:

6.14

PB Ratio

KOF:

1.31

CAT:

23.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

KOF:

$293.49B

CAT:

$70.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KOF:

$135.01B

CAT:

$23.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

KOF:

$41.79B

CAT:

$15.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOF vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOF
KOF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOF vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOFCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.72

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

12.18

-11.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

40.49

-38.90

KOF vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOF Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOF and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOFCATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

4.98

-4.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.08

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

1.02

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.03

Drawdowns

KOF vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOF drawdown since its inception was -74.81%, roughly equal to the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOF and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOFCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.81%

-73.43%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.13%

-13.88%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-34.05%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-34.05%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.04%

-43.36%

-11.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-0.08%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-19.74%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

4.17%

+5.61%

Volatility

KOF vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is 6.91%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that KOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOFCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

11.17%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.34%

27.09%

-8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

33.97%

-8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

30.62%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

30.86%

-4.89%

Dividends

KOF vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

KOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CAT's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.65%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.
3.78%4.09%4.20%3.37%3.99%4.59%5.22%2.75%2.95%2.52%2.84%2.74%

Financials

KOF vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
70.93B
17.42B
(KOF) Total Revenue
(CAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KOF vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and Caterpillar Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
46.9%
35.1%
Portfolio components
KOF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 33.26B and revenue of 70.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

CAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

KOF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 9.03B and revenue of 70.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

CAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

KOF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 4.34B and revenue of 70.93B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

CAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KOF and CAT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAT has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to KOF (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOF dropped -74.81% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOF and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer