PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KN vs. CTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KN vs. CTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knowles Corporation (KN) and CTS Corporation (CTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KN achieves a 73.87% return, which is significantly higher than CTS's 46.73% return. Over the past 10 years, KN has underperformed CTS with an annualized return of 9.01%, while CTS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.


KN

1D
-5.34%
1M
9.72%
YTD
73.87%
6M
59.44%
1Y
123.78%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
9.01%

CTS

1D
-5.18%
1M
4.75%
YTD
46.73%
6M
41.61%
1Y
52.33%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KN vs. CTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KN
Knowles Corporation
73.87%7.53%11.28%9.07%-29.68%26.70%-12.86%58.90%-9.21%-12.27%
CTS
CTS Corporation
46.73%-18.39%20.95%11.38%7.80%7.46%15.18%16.53%1.08%15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KN and CTS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.50

The correlation between KN and CTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KN:

$0.70

CTS:

$2.34

PE Ratio

KN:

52.87

CTS:

26.90

PEG Ratio

KN:

0.04

CTS:

1.17

PS Ratio

KN:

5.30

CTS:

3.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

KN:

$461.00M

CTS:

$555.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KN:

$261.30M

CTS:

$217.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

KN:

$143.70M

CTS:

$119.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KN vs. CTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KN
KN Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KN Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KN Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CTS
CTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KN vs. CTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knowles Corporation (KN) and CTS Corporation (CTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNCTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.26

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.13

2.59

+5.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.34

6.68

+15.66

KN vs. CTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KN Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the CTS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KN and CTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNCTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63

1.57

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.32

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.39

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.22

-0.16

Drawdowns

KN vs. CTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KN drawdown since its inception was -70.24%, smaller than the maximum CTS drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KN and CTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.24%

-97.23%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.32%

-20.31%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.00%

-40.62%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.55%

-40.62%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

-52.59%

+3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-7.67%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-50.47%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

7.86%

-2.30%

Volatility

KN vs. CTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Knowles Corporation (KN) is 12.86%, while CTS Corporation (CTS) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that KN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.86%

13.59%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.39%

24.76%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.34%

33.47%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.94%

33.49%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.48%

34.92%

-0.44%

Dividends

KN vs. CTS - Dividend Comparison

KN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTS
CTS Corporation
0.25%0.37%0.30%0.37%0.41%0.44%0.47%0.53%0.62%0.62%0.71%0.91%
KN
Knowles Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KN vs. CTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knowles Corporation and CTS Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
139.23M
(KN) Total Revenue
(CTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KN and CTS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTS has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to KN (12.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KN dropped -70.24% vs CTS's -97.23%.

KN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KN and CTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer