PortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and VONG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

KMB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
194.55%
743.20%
KMB
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KMB:

0.01

VONG:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

KMB:

0.14

VONG:

0.90

Omega Ratio

KMB:

1.02

VONG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

KMB:

0.01

VONG:

0.57

Martin Ratio

KMB:

0.03

VONG:

2.00

Ulcer Index

KMB:

6.32%

VONG:

6.61%

Daily Std Dev

KMB:

19.02%

VONG:

24.89%

Max Drawdown

KMB:

-39.69%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

KMB:

-10.71%

VONG:

-12.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 5.09%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.95% annualized return.


KMB

YTD

1.33%

1M

-5.73%

6M

-1.15%

1Y

-0.10%

5Y*

2.03%

10Y*

5.09%

VONG

YTD

-8.98%

1M

-1.90%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

13.90%

5Y*

17.66%

10Y*

14.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMB vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMB is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMB is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMB is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMB is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMB is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMB is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KMB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
KMB: 0.01
VONG: 0.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
KMB: 0.14
VONG: 0.90
The chart of Omega ratio for KMB, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
KMB: 1.02
VONG: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
KMB: 0.01
VONG: 0.57
The chart of Martin ratio for KMB, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
KMB: 0.03
VONG: 2.00

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.01
0.53
KMB
VONG

Dividends

KMB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VONG's 0.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.74%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

KMB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.71%
-12.68%
KMB
VONG

Volatility

KMB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.77%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.77%
16.63%
KMB
VONG