KMB vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KMB or VONG.
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and VONG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KMB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KMB:
0.71
VONG:
1.99
KMB:
1.04
VONG:
2.59
KMB:
1.16
VONG:
1.36
KMB:
0.75
VONG:
2.61
KMB:
3.08
VONG:
10.24
KMB:
4.16%
VONG:
3.34%
KMB:
18.03%
VONG:
17.20%
KMB:
-39.69%
VONG:
-32.72%
KMB:
-9.89%
VONG:
-3.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 33.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 4.65%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.
KMB
12.14%
-2.20%
-4.57%
14.69%
2.51%
4.65%
VONG
33.66%
3.67%
10.06%
33.57%
19.14%
16.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KMB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KMB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than VONG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 3.71% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KMB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 4.10%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.