KMB vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
KMB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KMB vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -2.10% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 0.12%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -28.75%
- 3Y*
- -6.54%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- 0.12%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
VONG
KMB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | 0.84 | -2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | 1.36 | -2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.19 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 1.22 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 4.16 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | 0.84 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.59 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.81 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.84 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and VONG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KMB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.19% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -32.72% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -16.23% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.73% | -32.72% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.73% | -32.72% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.86% | -12.29% | -18.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -4.90% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.08% | 4.78% | +14.30% |
Volatility
KMB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 5.31%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 6.81% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 12.37% | +8.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 22.42% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 21.35% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 20.82% | +0.01% |