KMB vs. VONG
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock, while VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.72%/yr vs 18.10%/yr for VONG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 1.72%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.10% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- -8.86%
- 3Y*
- -2.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
KMB vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 14.34% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 5.05% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and VONG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.26 |
The correlation between KMB and VONG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
VONG
KMB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.00 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 3.17 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -32.72% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -16.23% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -23.27% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -32.72% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -32.72% | -1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.25% | -3.61% | -15.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -4.88% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.94% | 5.11% | +14.83% |
Volatility
KMB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.53%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 6.53% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.09% | 13.26% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.74% | 16.56% | +10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.53% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 20.93% | +0.25% |
Dividends
KMB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than VONG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.52% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and VONG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to VONG (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs VONG's -32.72%.
VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer