KMB vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock, while VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.29%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for VONG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KMB vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -4.92% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 0.29%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.

KMB

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: -4.92%
• 6M: -8.51%
• 1Y: -29.05%
• 3Y*: -7.87%
• 5Y*: -2.82%
• 10Y*: 0.29%

VONG

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 6.52%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 24.92%
• 5Y*: 15.38%
• 10Y*: 18.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMB vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation	-4.92%	-19.86%	11.79%	-7.08%	-1.58%	9.66%	0.95%	24.57%	-2.06%	9.04%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	7.17%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and VONG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010	0.27

The correlation between KMB and VONG shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KMB vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB

KMB Risk / Return Rank: 4
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 41
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMB vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KMB	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	1.68	-2.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.50	2.29	-3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.29	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	1.59	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	5.34	-6.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KMB vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KMB	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.17	1.68	-2.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.72	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.89	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.90	-0.44

Drawdowns

KMB vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMB	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.97%	-32.72%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.79%	-16.23%	-13.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.06%	-23.27%	-10.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.06%	-32.72%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.06%	-32.72%	-1.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.85%	-1.66%	-31.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-4.88%	-3.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.81%	4.83%	+14.98%

Volatility

KMB vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.60%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMB	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	3.60%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.33%	11.61%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	15.37%	+9.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.95%	21.33%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.96%	20.87%	+0.09%

Dividends

KMB vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation	5.34%	5.00%	3.72%	3.88%	3.42%	3.19%	3.17%	3.00%	3.51%	3.22%	3.22%	2.77%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMB and VONG in my portfolio?

KMB and VONG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMB or VONG?

KMB has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VONG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.