PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLXE vs. NINE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KLXE vs. NINE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLXE achieves a 58.73% return, which is significantly lower than NINE's 3,113.77% return.


KLXE

1D
-2.91%
1M
-25.56%
YTD
58.73%
6M
80.72%
1Y
61.29%
3Y*
-30.89%
5Y*
-26.68%
10Y*

NINE

1D
0.09%
1M
11.32%
YTD
3,113.77%
6M
2,423.85%
1Y
2,061.06%
3Y*
48.83%
5Y*
35.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLXE vs. NINE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
58.73%-62.05%-55.77%-34.95%458.39%-52.01%-79.94%-72.54%-21.81%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
3,113.77%-69.13%-58.21%-81.56%1,353.00%-63.24%-65.22%-65.31%-25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between KLXE and NINE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018

0.47

The correlation between KLXE and NINE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KLXE:

$58.50M

NINE:

$154.98M

EPS

KLXE:

-$3.80

NINE:

$1.79

PS Ratio

KLXE:

0.09

NINE:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

KLXE:

$627.20M

NINE:

$541.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KLXE:

$83.20M

NINE:

$46.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

KLXE:

$66.60M

NINE:

$41.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Return for Risk

KLXE vs. NINE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLXE
KLXE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KLXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLXE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
KLXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLXE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

NINE
NINE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINE Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLXE vs. NINE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLXENINEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.71

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

21.32

-19.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

4.03

-2.85

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

30.98

-29.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.05

50.90

-48.85

KLXE vs. NINE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLXE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the NINE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLXE and NINE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLXENINEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.71

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.06

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

-0.02

-0.38

Drawdowns

KLXE vs. NINE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLXE drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum NINE drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLXE and NINE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLXENINEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-99.19%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.13%

-72.93%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.64%

-93.81%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.22%

-98.06%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.26%

-71.56%

-26.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.66%

-80.18%

-6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.99%

43.79%

-13.80%

Volatility

KLXE vs. NINE - Volatility Comparison

KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE) has a higher volatility of 26.80% compared to Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) at 10.35%. This indicates that KLXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLXENINEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.80%

10.35%

+16.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.35%

269.22%

-192.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.30%

1,318.80%

-1,220.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.64%

594.71%

-504.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.35%

465.60%

-366.25%

Dividends

KLXE vs. NINE - Dividend Comparison

Neither KLXE nor NINE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KLXE vs. NINE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. and Nine Energy Service, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
144.70M
130.00M
(KLXE) Total Revenue
(NINE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KLXE vs. NINE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. and Nine Energy Service, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
17.7%
4.3%
Portfolio components
KLXE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.60M and revenue of 144.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.7%.

NINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.63M and revenue of 130.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

KLXE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 144.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

NINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.08M and revenue of 130.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.

KLXE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -24.00M and revenue of 144.70M, resulting in a net margin of -16.6%.

NINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nine Energy Service, Inc. reported a net income of 106.63M and revenue of 130.00M, resulting in a net margin of 82.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KLXE and NINE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KLXE has higher volatility (26.80%) compared to NINE (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLXE dropped -99.11% vs NINE's -99.19%.

NINE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLXE and NINE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer