PortfoliosLab logo
KLIP vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and QQQ is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

KLIP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.35%
69.40%
KLIP
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KLIP:

-0.15

QQQ:

0.26

Sortino Ratio

KLIP:

-0.07

QQQ:

0.55

Omega Ratio

KLIP:

0.99

QQQ:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

KLIP:

-0.17

QQQ:

0.28

Martin Ratio

KLIP:

-0.68

QQQ:

1.10

Ulcer Index

KLIP:

4.59%

QQQ:

5.82%

Daily Std Dev

KLIP:

20.12%

QQQ:

24.42%

Max Drawdown

KLIP:

-18.61%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

KLIP:

-13.41%

QQQ:

-13.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -8.71% return.


KLIP

YTD

-4.83%

1M

-10.26%

6M

-4.81%

1Y

-3.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

-8.71%

1M

-1.28%

6M

-5.21%

1Y

6.02%

5Y*

19.14%

10Y*

16.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLIP vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KLIP: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLIP vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KLIP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
KLIP: -0.15
QQQ: 0.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
KLIP: -0.07
QQQ: 0.55
The chart of Omega ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
KLIP: 0.99
QQQ: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
KLIP: -0.17
QQQ: 0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
KLIP: -0.68
QQQ: 1.10

The current KLIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLIP and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.15
0.26
KLIP
QQQ

Dividends

KLIP vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.58%, more than QQQ's 0.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
49.58%54.85%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.64%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

KLIP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.41%
-13.50%
KLIP
QQQ

Volatility

KLIP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is 13.06%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that KLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.06%
15.74%
KLIP
QQQ