PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KLIC vs. UL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


KLICUL
YTD Return-11.60%13.39%
1Y Return-0.48%4.72%
3Y Return (Ann)2.36%0.11%
5Y Return (Ann)21.65%1.13%
10Y Return (Ann)14.48%5.19%
Sharpe Ratio0.030.31
Daily Std Dev33.30%15.19%
Max Drawdown-97.35%-53.55%
Current Drawdown-32.37%-2.50%

Fundamentals


KLICUL
Market Cap$2.67B$134.06B
EPS-$1.18$2.75
PE Ratio52.2419.46
PEG Ratio1.3114.11
Revenue (TTM)$736.50M$59.60B
Gross Profit (TTM)$748.32M$24.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$72.29M$11.06B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between KLIC and UL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

KLIC vs. UL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KLIC achieves a -11.60% return, which is significantly lower than UL's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, KLIC has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 14.48%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
924.57%
10,955.19%
KLIC
UL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

The Unilever Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLIC vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLIC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KLIC, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KLIC, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KLIC, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KLIC, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KLIC, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.03
UL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UL, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UL, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UL, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UL, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UL, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.64

KLIC vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of KLIC and UL.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.01
0.31
KLIC
UL

Dividends

KLIC vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

KLIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than UL's 4.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
1.61%1.41%1.58%0.97%1.57%1.76%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UL
The Unilever Group
4.24%3.83%3.61%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.82%3.44%3.06%3.72%3.39%

Drawdowns

KLIC vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIC drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIC and UL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-32.37%
-2.50%
KLIC
UL

Volatility

KLIC vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 5.69%. This indicates that KLIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.86%
5.69%
KLIC
UL

Financials

KLIC vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items