KLIC vs. UL
KLIC (Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.) and UL (Unilever PLC) are both stocks. KLIC operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, KLIC returned 28.18%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for UL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KLIC vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLIC achieves a 173.99% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -7.84% return. Over the past 10 years, KLIC has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 28.18%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.
KLIC
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 19.19%
- YTD
- 173.99%
- 6M
- 169.84%
- 1Y
- 276.62%
- 3Y*
- 32.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.34%
- 10Y*
- 28.18%
UL
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- -12.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
KLIC vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 173.99% | -0.28% | -13.23% | 25.45% | -25.78% | 92.36% | 19.43% | 36.94% | -15.34% | 52.60% |
UL Unilever PLC | -7.84% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLIC and UL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.17 |
The correlation between KLIC and UL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KLIC:
$6.58B
UL:
$130.07B
KLIC:
$1.05
UL:
€5.06
KLIC:
118.86
UL:
10.24
KLIC:
1.06
UL:
2.00
KLIC:
8.52
UL:
1.11
KLIC:
7.67
UL:
7.33
KLIC:
$768.22M
UL:
€109.27B
KLIC:
$369.11M
UL:
€90.89B
KLIC:
$79.58M
UL:
€24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLIC vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
KLIC
UL
KLIC vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLIC | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 0.92 | +0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.49 | -0.51 | +16.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.66 | -1.01 | +44.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLIC vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLIC drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIC and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLIC | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.35% | -53.55% | -43.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -25.09% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.47% | -25.09% | -27.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.44% | -25.66% | -34.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.44% | -30.13% | -30.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.19% | +19.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.44% | -10.61% | -45.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 12.50% | -6.13% |
Volatility
KLIC vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) has a higher volatility of 16.72% compared to Unilever PLC (UL) at 6.90%. This indicates that KLIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLIC | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.72% | 6.90% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.66% | 16.99% | +21.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.00% | 21.70% | +27.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.32% | 20.92% | +24.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 21.51% | +22.51% |
Dividends
KLIC vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
KLIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than UL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 0.66% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 0.97% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.85% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
KLIC vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLIC vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
KLIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.01M and revenue of 242.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KLIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.01M and revenue of 242.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
KLIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 35.15M and revenue of 242.62M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLIC and UL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLIC has higher volatility (16.72%) compared to UL (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLIC dropped -97.35% vs UL's -53.55%.
KLIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLIC and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer