KIRK vs. PEP

In the year-to-date period, KIRK achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's -4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, KIRK has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of -23.87%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kirkland's, Inc. (KIRK) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current KIRK Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is comparable to the PEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIRK and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

KIRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.

The maximum KIRK drawdown since its inception was -97.81%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIRK and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Kirkland's, Inc. (KIRK) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 7.37%. This indicates that KIRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kirkland's, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.