KIM vs. VOO
KIM (Kimco Realty Corporation) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, KIM returned 2.97%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KIM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KIM achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, KIM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.97%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
KIM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
KIM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIM Kimco Realty Corporation | 18.58% | -9.26% | 15.02% | 6.05% | -10.80% | 69.48% | -23.94% | 49.75% | -13.26% | -23.67% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIM and VOO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KIM and VOO has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
KIM
VOO
KIM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 3.16 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 14.73 | -11.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.39 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.83 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.87 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.89 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
KIM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIM drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.65% | -33.99% | -51.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -8.90% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.88% | -18.69% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.61% | -24.52% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.52% | -33.99% | -35.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -0.70% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.83% | -3.69% | -19.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 1.91% | +3.58% |
Volatility
KIM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that KIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 2.84% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 8.90% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 11.80% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 16.81% | +9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.92% | 18.01% | +15.91% |
Dividends
KIM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
KIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIM Kimco Realty Corporation | 4.29% | 4.98% | 4.14% | 4.79% | 3.97% | 2.76% | 3.60% | 5.41% | 7.65% | 6.01% | 4.11% | 3.68% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KIM and VOO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KIM has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIM dropped -85.65% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KIM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer