PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KIM vs. BRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KIM vs. BRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIM achieves a 28.50% return, which is significantly higher than BRX's 24.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KIM has underperformed BRX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while BRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.29% annualized return.


KIM

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.63%
6M
23.56%
YTD
28.50%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
2.77%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

BRX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.99%
6M
20.07%
YTD
24.15%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
6.29%
ALL TIME*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$80.71M$71.44M$76.94M
$117.65M$103.08M$119.50M

KIM vs. BRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
28.50%-9.26%15.02%6.05%-10.80%69.48%-23.94%49.75%-13.26%-23.67%
BRX
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
24.15%-1.67%25.19%7.71%-6.79%60.29%-19.44%56.89%-15.93%-19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KIM and BRX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013

0.85

The correlation between KIM and BRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KIM:

$17.18B

BRX:

$9.67B

EPS

KIM:

$0.91

BRX:

$1.56

PE Ratio

KIM:

27.88

BRX:

20.26

PEG Ratio

KIM:

0.25

BRX:

0.21

PS Ratio

KIM:

7.95

BRX:

5.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

KIM:

$2.16B

BRX:

$1.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KIM:

$1.18B

BRX:

$888.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

KIM:

$1.10B

BRX:

$1.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KIM vs. BRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KIM
KIM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
KIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BRX
BRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KIM vs. BRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KIMBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.10

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

5.96

-1.26

KIM vs. BRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the BRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIM and BRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KIM vs. BRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIM drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, which is greater than BRX's maximum drawdown of -66.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIM and BRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KIMBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.65%

-66.54%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-12.36%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-22.43%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-31.59%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.53%

-66.54%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-3.61%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-15.66%

-7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

4.36%

+1.11%

Volatility

KIM vs. BRX - Volatility Comparison

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) at 5.33%. This indicates that KIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KIMBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.33%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

12.87%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

18.35%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.48%

24.61%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.00%

34.15%

-0.15%

Dividends

KIM vs. BRX - Dividend Comparison

KIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than BRX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRX
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
3.84%4.39%3.92%4.47%4.23%3.38%3.44%5.18%7.49%5.57%4.01%3.49%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
4.04%4.98%4.14%4.79%3.97%2.76%3.60%5.41%7.65%6.01%4.11%3.68%

Financials

KIM vs. BRX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimco Realty Corporation and Brixmor Property Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KIM vs. BRX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimco Realty Corporation and Brixmor Property Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 385.80M and revenue of 558.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

BRX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brixmor Property Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 309.92M and revenue of 354.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.5%.

KIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 207.77M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

BRX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brixmor Property Group Inc. reported an operating income of 73.66M and revenue of 354.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

KIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a net income of 164.90M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

BRX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brixmor Property Group Inc. reported a net income of -7.00K and revenue of 354.20M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KIM and BRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KIM has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to BRX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIM dropped -85.65% vs BRX's -66.54%.

BRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIM and BRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer