PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KIM vs. AVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KIM vs. AVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KIM achieves a 27.04% return, which is significantly higher than AVB's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, KIM has underperformed AVB with an annualized return of 3.44%, while AVB has yielded a comparatively higher 4.01% annualized return.


KIM

1D
2.03%
1M
5.62%
YTD
27.04%
6M
28.05%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
3.44%

AVB

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.42%
1Y
-8.82%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIM vs. AVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
27.04%-9.26%15.02%6.05%-10.80%69.48%-23.94%49.75%-13.26%-23.67%
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
1.63%-14.60%21.44%20.34%-33.92%62.17%-20.27%24.10%1.00%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KIM and AVB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1994

0.61

The correlation between KIM and AVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KIM:

$16.95B

AVB:

$25.66B

EPS

KIM:

$0.91

AVB:

$8.02

PE Ratio

KIM:

27.59

AVB:

22.73

PEG Ratio

KIM:

0.24

AVB:

13.07

PS Ratio

KIM:

7.87

AVB:

8.47

PB Ratio

KIM:

1.63

AVB:

2.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

KIM:

$2.16B

AVB:

$3.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KIM:

$1.18B

AVB:

$2.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

KIM:

$1.10B

AVB:

$1.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KIM vs. AVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KIM
KIM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
KIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AVB
AVB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIM vs. AVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KIMAVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.94

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.45

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

-0.88

+5.28

KIM vs. AVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the AVB Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KIM and AVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KIM vs. AVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIM drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, which is greater than AVB's maximum drawdown of -70.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIM and AVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KIMAVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.65%

-70.04%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-19.89%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-29.40%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-38.36%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.52%

-46.91%

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-19.09%

+16.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.79%

-11.75%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

10.64%

-5.11%

Volatility

KIM vs. AVB - Volatility Comparison

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) at 5.97%. This indicates that KIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KIMAVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

5.97%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

15.50%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

20.46%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.92%

22.22%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.99%

24.73%

+9.26%

Dividends

KIM vs. AVB - Dividend Comparison

KIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than AVB's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
3.86%3.86%3.09%3.53%3.94%2.52%3.96%2.90%3.38%3.18%3.05%2.72%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
4.09%4.98%4.14%4.79%3.97%2.76%3.60%5.41%7.65%6.01%4.11%3.68%

Financials

KIM vs. AVB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimco Realty Corporation and AvalonBay Communities, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
558.02M
770.28M
(KIM) Total Revenue
(AVB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KIM vs. AVB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimco Realty Corporation and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
69.1%
67.7%
Portfolio components
KIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 385.80M and revenue of 558.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

AVB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a gross profit of 521.68M and revenue of 770.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

KIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 207.77M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

AVB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported an operating income of 218.54M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

KIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a net income of 164.90M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

AVB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a net income of 325.73M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in a net margin of 42.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KIM and AVB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KIM has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to AVB (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIM dropped -85.65% vs AVB's -70.04%.

KIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIM and AVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer