KIM vs. ABBV
KIM (Kimco Realty Corporation) and ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) are both stocks. KIM operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, KIM returned 2.97%/yr vs 17.56%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KIM vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KIM achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, KIM has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 2.97%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.56% annualized return.
KIM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
ABBV
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 18.44%
- 10Y*
- 17.56%
KIM vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIM Kimco Realty Corporation | 18.58% | -9.26% | 15.02% | 6.05% | -10.80% | 69.48% | -23.94% | 49.75% | -13.26% | -23.67% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | -3.41% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KIM and ABBV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
KIM:
$15.99B
ABBV:
$385.19B
KIM:
$0.91
ABBV:
$2.05
KIM:
26.04
ABBV:
105.79
KIM:
7.42
ABBV:
6.13
KIM:
1.54
ABBV:
14.01
KIM:
$2.16B
ABBV:
$62.82B
KIM:
$1.18B
ABBV:
$46.15B
KIM:
$1.10B
ABBV:
$17.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KIM vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
KIM
ABBV
KIM vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KIM | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.14 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 2.57 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KIM | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.83 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.81 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.68 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.73 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
KIM vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KIM drawdown since its inception was -85.65%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIM and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KIM | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.65% | -45.09% | -40.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -17.32% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.88% | -20.74% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.61% | -21.92% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.52% | -45.09% | -24.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -9.04% | +5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.83% | -10.73% | -12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 7.69% | -2.20% |
Volatility
KIM vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is 5.14%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that KIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KIM | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 5.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 17.61% | -5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 23.96% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 22.84% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.92% | 25.74% | +8.18% |
Dividends
KIM vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
KIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than ABBV's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.10% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
KIM Kimco Realty Corporation | 4.29% | 4.98% | 4.14% | 4.79% | 3.97% | 2.76% | 3.60% | 5.41% | 7.65% | 6.01% | 4.11% | 3.68% |
Financials
KIM vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimco Realty Corporation and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KIM vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison
KIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 385.80M and revenue of 558.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
KIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 207.77M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
KIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimco Realty Corporation reported a net income of 164.90M and revenue of 558.02M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KIM and ABBV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to KIM (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KIM dropped -85.65% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
KIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KIM and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer