PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGS vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGS vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 82.64% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -14.39% return.


KGS

1D
2.94%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
82.64%
6M
97.53%
1Y
95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTR

1D
-5.28%
1M
5.62%
YTD
-14.39%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
118.84%
5Y*
45.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGS vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
82.64%-3.73%115.21%30.79%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-14.39%135.03%340.48%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between KGS and PLTR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.14

The correlation between KGS and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGS:

$5.88B

PLTR:

$391.22B

EPS

KGS:

$0.77

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

KGS:

87.08

PLTR:

171.24

PEG Ratio

KGS:

8.80

PLTR:

1.00

PS Ratio

KGS:

4.47

PLTR:

74.78

PB Ratio

KGS:

5.00

PLTR:

46.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGS:

$1.32B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGS:

$487.67M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

KGS:

$469.03M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGS vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGS
KGS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGS vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KGSPLTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

0.30

+2.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

0.74

+2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.09

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

0.41

+5.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.35

0.76

+14.59

KGS vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGS Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGS and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KGSPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

0.30

+2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

0.91

+1.03

Drawdowns

KGS vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGSPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-84.62%

+46.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-38.19%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.46%

-26.55%

+15.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-40.31%

+28.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.44%

20.30%

-13.86%

Volatility

KGS vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) is 13.36%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.05%. This indicates that KGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGSPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

17.05%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.12%

37.73%

-12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.97%

51.27%

-16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.91%

65.36%

-27.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

69.82%

-31.91%

Dividends

KGS vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
2.86%4.81%3.87%1.89%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KGS vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
345.76M
1.63B
(KGS) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KGS vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
86.8%
Portfolio components
KGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

KGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

KGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGS and PLTR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.05%) compared to KGS (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGS and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer