KGS vs. FTK
KGS (Kodiak Gas Services Inc.) and FTK (Flotek Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry within the Energy sector. Over the past year, KGS returned 95.37% vs 59.69% for FTK. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KGS vs. FTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 82.64% return, which is significantly higher than FTK's 35.40% return.
KGS
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 82.64%
- 6M
- 97.53%
- 1Y
- 95.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTK
- 1D
- 14.64%
- 1M
- 38.21%
- YTD
- 35.40%
- 6M
- 66.17%
- 1Y
- 59.69%
- 3Y*
- 86.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- -10.62%
KGS vs. FTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 82.64% | -3.73% | 115.21% | 30.79% |
FTK Flotek Industries, Inc. | 35.40% | 80.80% | 143.11% | -10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGS and FTK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
KGS:
$5.88B
FTK:
$894.47M
KGS:
$0.77
FTK:
$0.80
KGS:
87.08
FTK:
29.12
KGS:
8.80
FTK:
9.70
KGS:
4.47
FTK:
3.45
KGS:
5.00
FTK:
7.57
KGS:
$1.32B
FTK:
$251.95M
KGS:
$487.67M
FTK:
$61.72M
KGS:
$469.03M
FTK:
$37.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGS vs. FTK — Risk / Return Rank
KGS
FTK
KGS vs. FTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGS | FTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 0.90 | +1.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 1.71 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.20 | 1.77 | +4.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 3.46 | +11.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGS | FTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 0.90 | +1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | -0.03 | +1.96 |
Drawdowns
KGS vs. FTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum FTK drawdown of -99.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and FTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGS | FTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -99.14% | +60.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.95% | -33.29% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -97.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.46% | -92.73% | +81.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -78.39% | +66.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.44% | 17.06% | -10.62% |
Volatility
KGS vs. FTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) is 13.36%, while Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that KGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGS | FTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 21.99% | -8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.12% | 45.36% | -20.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 66.96% | -31.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 84.00% | -46.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 87.33% | -49.42% |
Dividends
KGS vs. FTK - Dividend Comparison
KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while FTK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTK Flotek Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 2.86% | 4.81% | 3.87% | 1.89% |
Financials
KGS vs. FTK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and Flotek Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGS vs. FTK - Profitability Comparison
KGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FTK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.54M and revenue of 70.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.
KGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
FTK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.59M and revenue of 70.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
KGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
FTK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.66M and revenue of 70.05M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGS and FTK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTK has higher volatility (21.99%) compared to KGS (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs FTK's -99.14%.
KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGS and FTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer