PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGS vs. FTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGS vs. FTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 94.87% return, which is significantly higher than FTK's 36.22% return.


KGS

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
94.87%
6M
96.66%
1Y
120.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTK

1D
-3.53%
1M
17.82%
YTD
36.22%
6M
27.00%
1Y
64.36%
3Y*
75.80%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
-11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGS vs. FTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
94.87%-3.73%115.21%31.97%
FTK
Flotek Industries, Inc.
36.22%80.80%143.11%-7.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KGS and FTK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGS:

$6.27B

FTK:

$899.84M

EPS

KGS:

$0.77

FTK:

$0.80

PE Ratio

KGS:

92.91

FTK:

29.30

PEG Ratio

KGS:

9.39

FTK:

9.76

PS Ratio

KGS:

4.77

FTK:

3.47

PB Ratio

KGS:

5.34

FTK:

7.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGS:

$1.32B

FTK:

$251.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGS:

$487.67M

FTK:

$61.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

KGS:

$469.03M

FTK:

$37.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGS vs. FTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGS
KGS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FTK
FTK Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGS vs. FTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGSFTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.50

2.30

+6.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.69

4.50

+17.18

KGS vs. FTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGS Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the FTK Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGS and FTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGS vs. FTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum FTK drawdown of -99.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and FTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGSFTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-99.14%

+60.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-28.16%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-92.69%

+87.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-78.42%

+67.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

14.33%

-8.77%

Volatility

KGS vs. FTK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) is 11.55%, while Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) has a volatility of 21.42%. This indicates that KGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGSFTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.55%

21.42%

-9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.42%

45.64%

-20.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.11%

66.59%

-31.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.86%

84.08%

-46.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.86%

87.39%

-49.53%

Dividends

KGS vs. FTK - Dividend Comparison

KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while FTK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTK
Flotek Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
2.68%4.81%3.87%1.89%

Financials

KGS vs. FTK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and Flotek Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
345.76M
70.05M
(KGS) Total Revenue
(FTK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KGS vs. FTK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and Flotek Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
22.2%
Portfolio components
KGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FTK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.54M and revenue of 70.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

KGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

FTK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.59M and revenue of 70.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

KGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

FTK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flotek Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.66M and revenue of 70.05M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGS and FTK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTK has higher volatility (21.42%) compared to KGS (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs FTK's -99.14%.

KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGS and FTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer