PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGS vs. EME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGS vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 94.87% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 37.22% return.


KGS

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
94.87%
6M
96.66%
1Y
120.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EME

1D
-3.48%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
37.22%
6M
34.18%
1Y
69.88%
3Y*
68.85%
5Y*
46.70%
10Y*
33.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGS vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
94.87%-3.73%115.21%31.97%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
37.22%35.05%111.27%20.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KGS and EME is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGS:

$6.27B

EME:

$37.78B

EPS

KGS:

$0.77

EME:

$29.65

PE Ratio

KGS:

92.91

EME:

28.28

PEG Ratio

KGS:

9.39

EME:

0.66

PS Ratio

KGS:

4.77

EME:

2.13

PB Ratio

KGS:

5.34

EME:

9.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGS:

$1.32B

EME:

$17.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGS:

$487.67M

EME:

$3.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

KGS:

$469.03M

EME:

$2.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGS vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGS
KGS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGS vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGSEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.50

2.79

+5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.69

6.80

+14.89

KGS vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGS Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGS and EME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGS vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and EME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGSEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-70.56%

+31.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-25.15%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-11.14%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-15.36%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

10.31%

-4.75%

Volatility

KGS vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) have volatilities of 11.55% and 11.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGSEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.55%

11.31%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.42%

26.44%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.11%

39.02%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.86%

33.47%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.86%

33.07%

+4.79%

Dividends

KGS vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than EME's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.16%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%
KGS
Kodiak Gas Services Inc.
2.68%4.81%3.87%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KGS vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
345.76M
4.63B
(KGS) Total Revenue
(EME) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KGS vs. EME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
18.7%
Portfolio components
KGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

KGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

KGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGS and EME have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGS has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to EME (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs EME's -70.56%.

KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGS and EME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer