KGS vs. EME

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME).

Performance

KGS vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KGS vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc.	57.47%	-3.73%	115.21%	30.79%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	20.75%	35.05%	111.27%	17.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KGS : $5.10B EME : $33.26B
EPS KGS : $0.91 EME : $28.22
PE Ratio KGS : 63.88 EME : 26.17
PEG Ratio KGS : 7.39 EME : 0.61
PS Ratio KGS : 3.93 EME : 1.96
PB Ratio KGS : 4.23 EME : 9.05
Total Revenue (TTM) KGS : $1.31B EME : $16.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) KGS : $478.64M EME : $3.33B
EBITDA (TTM) KGS : $489.72M EME : $1.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 57.47% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 20.75% return.

KGS

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 57.47%
• 6M: 61.45%
• 1Y: 64.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EME

• 1D: 5.31%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 20.75%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 100.16%
• 3Y*: 66.05%
• 5Y*: 45.89%
• 10Y*: 31.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KGS vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGS

KGS Risk / Return Rank: 84
KGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
KGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
KGS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
KGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
KGS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 91
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGS vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KGS	EME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.50	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.80	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.96	-1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	10.24	-3.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KGS vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGS and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KGS	EME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.50	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.84	0.59	+1.24

Correlation

The correlation between KGS and EME is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KGS vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than EME's 0.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc.	3.22%	4.81%	3.87%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.16%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%

Drawdowns

KGS vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and EME.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGS	EME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.57%	-70.56%	+31.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.93%	-25.15%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-9.16%	+7.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-15.43%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.83%	9.72%	-0.89%

Volatility

KGS vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) is 9.52%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that KGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGS	EME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.52%	11.59%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.71%	32.46%	-6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.95%	40.22%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.10%	32.90%	+5.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.10%	32.75%	+5.35%

Financials

KGS vs. EME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 332.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 935.60M and revenue of 4.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.7%.

KGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 86.89M and revenue of 332.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 531.64M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

KGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 24.63M and revenue of 332.87M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 431.79M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.