KGS vs. EME
KGS (Kodiak Gas Services Inc.) and EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) are both stocks. KGS operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while EME operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, KGS returned 53.72%/yr vs 55.31%/yr for EME. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KGS vs. EME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 59.59% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 30.55% return.
KGS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -13.59%
- 6M
- 42.08%
- YTD
- 59.59%
- 1Y
- 96.08%
- 3Y*
- 53.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 61.13%
EME
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 55.31%
- 5Y*
- 46.08%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $368.60M | $378.28M | $358.64M | |
| $113.32M | $111.82M | $142.61M |
KGS vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 59.59% | -3.73% | 115.21% | 31.97% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 30.55% | 35.05% | 111.27% | 20.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGS and EME is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
KGS:
$5.92B
EME:
$35.44B
KGS:
$0.78
EME:
$42.53
KGS:
75.51
EME:
18.75
KGS:
7.63
EME:
0.44
KGS:
3.87
EME:
1.45
KGS:
$1.32B
EME:
$18.60B
KGS:
$487.67M
EME:
$3.66B
KGS:
$469.03M
EME:
$2.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGS vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank
KGS
EME
KGS vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGS | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.96 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 2.30 | +10.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGS vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and EME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGS | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -70.56% | +31.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -28.71% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.57% | -36.19% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.02% | -15.46% | -7.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -15.37% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 11.91% | -4.95% |
Volatility
KGS vs. EME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) is 16.47%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that KGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGS | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.47% | 21.02% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | 33.40% | -2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.57% | 44.13% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 34.90% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 33.77% | +4.86% |
Dividends
KGS vs. EME - Dividend Comparison
KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than EME's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.18% | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% |
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 3.27% | 4.81% | 3.87% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KGS vs. EME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGS vs. EME - Profitability Comparison
KGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 5.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
KGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
EME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 547.34M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
KGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
EME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 403.69M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGS and EME have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EME has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to KGS (16.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs EME's -70.56%.
KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGS and EME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer