KGS vs. DTM
KGS (Kodiak Gas Services Inc.) and DTM (DT Midstream, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — KGS in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, DTM in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 3 years, KGS returned 51.89%/yr vs 42.55%/yr for DTM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KGS vs. DTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGS achieves a 57.82% return, which is significantly higher than DTM's 14.51% return.
KGS
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- 6M
- 42.09%
- YTD
- 57.82%
- 1Y
- 93.91%
- 3Y*
- 51.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 60.35%
DTM
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 31.66%
- 3Y*
- 42.55%
- 5Y*
- 30.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 33.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125.64M | $112.67M | $103.66M | |
| $113.84M | $110.76M | $143.41M |
KGS vs. DTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 57.82% | -3.73% | 115.21% | 31.97% |
DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 14.51% | 24.13% | 88.95% | 16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGS and DTM is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
KGS:
$5.86B
DTM:
$13.81B
KGS:
$0.78
DTM:
$4.60
KGS:
74.67
DTM:
29.43
KGS:
7.55
DTM:
3.02
KGS:
3.83
DTM:
10.60
KGS:
4.32
DTM:
2.91
KGS:
$1.32B
DTM:
$1.31B
KGS:
$487.67M
DTM:
$828.00M
KGS:
$469.03M
DTM:
$1.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGS vs. DTM — Risk / Return Rank
KGS
DTM
KGS vs. DTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) and DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGS | DTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.11 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 8.95 | +4.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGS vs. DTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGS drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, which is greater than DTM's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGS and DTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGS | DTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -23.56% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -10.22% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.57% | -23.56% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.88% | -10.22% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -5.95% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.12% | 3.55% | +3.57% |
Volatility
KGS vs. DTM - Volatility Comparison
Kodiak Gas Services Inc. (KGS) has a higher volatility of 15.49% compared to DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) at 6.71%. This indicates that KGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGS | DTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.49% | 6.71% | +8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.47% | 16.35% | +14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.49% | 20.86% | +17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 25.16% | +13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 25.69% | +12.92% |
Dividends
KGS vs. DTM - Dividend Comparison
KGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than DTM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 2.51% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 5.04% | 4.63% | 2.50% |
KGS Kodiak Gas Services Inc. | 3.31% | 4.81% | 3.87% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KGS vs. DTM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kodiak Gas Services Inc. and DT Midstream, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGS vs. DTM - Profitability Comparison
KGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 345.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DTM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a gross profit of 253.00M and revenue of 343.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.
KGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported an operating income of 106.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
DTM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported an operating income of 173.00M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.4%.
KGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kodiak Gas Services Inc. reported a net income of 17.81M and revenue of 345.76M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
DTM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGS and DTM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGS has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to DTM (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGS dropped -38.57% vs DTM's -23.56%.
KGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGS and DTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer