KGRN vs. SPY
KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KGRN returned -7.84%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for SPY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
KGRN vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.33% return.
KGRN
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
KGRN vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.04% | 21.45% | -1.11% | -14.75% | -40.45% | 5.91% | 138.49% | 12.12% | -29.32% | -0.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.33% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and SPY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017 | 0.39 |
KGRN vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KGRN
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
KGRN
SPY
Industrials
KGRN
SPY
Utilities
KGRN
SPY
Technology
KGRN
SPY
Energy
KGRN
SPY
Basic Materials
KGRN
-
SPY
Communication Services
KGRN
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
KGRN
-
SPY
Financial Services
KGRN
-
SPY
Healthcare
KGRN
-
SPY
Real Estate
KGRN
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGRN vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
KGRN
SPY
KGRN vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.44 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 3.22 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 14.99 | -14.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 2.42 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.82 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.59 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | -55.19% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | -8.88% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | -18.76% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | -24.50% | -39.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.62% | -0.33% | -47.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -9.05% | -24.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 1.91% | +8.22% |
Volatility
KGRN vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.79%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 2.79% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 8.91% | +6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.05% | 11.82% | +11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.75% | 17.05% | +17.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 17.93% | +14.93% |
KGRN vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGRN vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGRN and SPY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGRN has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to SPY (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGRN dropped -66.24% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.91% vs -7.84% for KGRN. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.91% return vs -7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.
KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGRN and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer