KGRN vs. SPY
KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KGRN returned -11.63%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for SPY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
KGRN vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.58% return.
KGRN
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -15.15%
- YTD
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- -14.85%
- 3Y*
- -4.18%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
KGRN vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | -13.08% | 21.45% | -1.11% | -14.75% | -40.45% | 5.91% | 138.49% | 12.12% | -29.32% | -0.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.58% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and SPY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.39 |
The correlation between KGRN and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KGRN vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KGRN
SPY
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
KGRN
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
KGRN
SPY
Utilities
KGRN
SPY
Technology
KGRN
SPY
Energy
KGRN
SPY
Basic Materials
KGRN
-
SPY
Communication Services
KGRN
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
KGRN
-
SPY
Financial Services
KGRN
-
SPY
Healthcare
KGRN
-
SPY
Real Estate
KGRN
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGRN vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
KGRN
SPY
KGRN vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.28 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.22 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 9.66 | -10.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | -55.19% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.36% | -8.88% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | -18.76% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | -24.50% | -39.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.48% | -1.89% | -52.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -9.02% | -25.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.20% | 2.04% | +11.16% |
Volatility
KGRN vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.67%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGRN | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 3.67% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 10.06% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 12.63% | +10.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.60% | 17.17% | +17.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 17.93% | +14.81% |
KGRN vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGRN vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.98% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGRN and SPY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGRN has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to SPY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGRN dropped -66.24% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.02% vs -11.63% for KGRN. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.02% return vs -11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for KGRN.
KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGRN and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer