PortfoliosLab logo
KGRN vs. KALL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KGRN and KALL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

KGRN vs. KALL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.24%
1.64%
KGRN
KALL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KGRN:

0.55

KALL:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

KGRN:

1.06

KALL:

0.88

Omega Ratio

KGRN:

1.13

KALL:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

KGRN:

0.34

KALL:

0.30

Martin Ratio

KGRN:

1.72

KALL:

0.97

Ulcer Index

KGRN:

12.57%

KALL:

16.28%

Daily Std Dev

KGRN:

37.99%

KALL:

34.02%

Max Drawdown

KGRN:

-66.37%

KALL:

-56.32%

Current Drawdown

KGRN:

-50.80%

KALL:

-39.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than KALL's 8.37% return.


KGRN

YTD

14.55%

1M

11.22%

6M

13.27%

1Y

20.56%

5Y*

8.31%

10Y*

N/A

KALL

YTD

8.37%

1M

9.60%

6M

4.63%

1Y

14.75%

5Y*

0.31%

10Y*

0.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KGRN vs. KALL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KALL's 0.49% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KGRN vs. KALL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGRN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KGRN is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KGRN is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KGRN is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KGRN is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KGRN is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KGRN is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

KALL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KALL is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KALL is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KALL is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KALL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KALL is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KALL is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KGRN vs. KALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KGRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the KALL Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGRN and KALL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.55
0.44
KGRN
KALL

Dividends

KGRN vs. KALL - Dividend Comparison

KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than KALL's 2.15% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
1.30%1.49%0.74%1.60%0.41%0.01%5.88%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
2.15%2.33%3.37%2.28%4.64%1.01%1.45%2.06%1.21%6.62%0.56%

Drawdowns

KGRN vs. KALL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.37%, which is greater than KALL's maximum drawdown of -56.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and KALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-50.80%
-39.05%
KGRN
KALL

Volatility

KGRN vs. KALL - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) at 6.32%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.41%
6.32%
KGRN
KALL