PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KGC vs. AAAU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and AAAU is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

KGC vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
15.19%
11.09%
KGC
AAAU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KGC:

2.04

AAAU:

2.25

Sortino Ratio

KGC:

2.56

AAAU:

2.93

Omega Ratio

KGC:

1.32

AAAU:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

KGC:

1.02

AAAU:

4.14

Martin Ratio

KGC:

12.98

AAAU:

11.29

Ulcer Index

KGC:

6.47%

AAAU:

2.98%

Daily Std Dev

KGC:

41.17%

AAAU:

14.93%

Max Drawdown

KGC:

-96.04%

AAAU:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

KGC:

-61.73%

AAAU:

-2.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 3.47% return.


KGC

YTD

10.36%

1M

6.90%

6M

15.19%

1Y

90.79%

5Y*

20.15%

10Y*

12.18%

AAAU

YTD

3.47%

1M

2.72%

6M

11.09%

1Y

35.08%

5Y*

11.60%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KGC vs. AAAU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KGC is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KGC is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KGC is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KGC is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KGC is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KGC is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAAU is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAAU is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAAU is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KGC vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KGC, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.042.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for KGC, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.562.93
The chart of Omega ratio for KGC, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.321.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for KGC, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.744.14
The chart of Martin ratio for KGC, currently valued at 12.97, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0012.9811.29
KGC
AAAU

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.04
2.25
KGC
AAAU

Dividends

KGC vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.88%0.97%1.98%2.93%2.07%0.82%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KGC vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.84%
-2.65%
KGC
AAAU

Volatility

KGC vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 13.56% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 3.68%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.56%
3.68%
KGC
AAAU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab