KGC vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KGC or AAAU.
Key characteristics
KGC | AAAU | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 55.50% | 24.57% |
1Y Return | 78.41% | 30.85% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 12.93% | 11.13% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 19.44% | 11.73% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 2.17 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 2.90 |
Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.38 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 4.14 |
Martin Ratio | 11.01 | 13.73 |
Ulcer Index | 7.59% | 2.32% |
Daily Std Dev | 39.52% | 14.63% |
Max Drawdown | -96.04% | -21.63% |
Current Drawdown | -65.24% | -7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and AAAU is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KGC vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a 55.50% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 24.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KGC vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KGC vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kinross Gold Corporation | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% |
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KGC vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KGC vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 5.41%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.