KFYP vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF (KFYP) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
KFYP and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KFYP is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI CICC Select 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 23, 2013. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both KFYP and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KFYP or CNYA.
Key characteristics
| KFYP | CNYA |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between KFYP and CNYA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KFYP vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KFYP vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KFYP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KFYP vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF (KFYP) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KFYP vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
KFYP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFYP KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF | 101.66% | 101.66% | 3.72% | 2.17% | 2.65% | 0.17% | 3.13% | 0.89% | 2.44% | 5.12% | 0.95% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 4.03% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KFYP vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
KFYP vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF (KFYP) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that KFYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.