KFVG vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CICC China 5G & Semiconductor Index ETF (KFVG) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
KFVG and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KFVG is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CICC China 5G and Semiconductor Leaders Index. It was launched on Nov 24, 2020. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both KFVG and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KFVG or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between KFVG and SMH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KFVG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
KFVG
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SMH
3.23%
-6.43%
1.09%
19.61%
28.96%
25.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KFVG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KFVG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KFVG vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KFVG
SMH
KFVG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CICC China 5G & Semiconductor Index ETF (KFVG) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KFVG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
KFVG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFVG KraneShares CICC China 5G & Semiconductor Index ETF | 99.73% | 99.73% | 0.26% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.43% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
KFVG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
KFVG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares CICC China 5G & Semiconductor Index ETF (KFVG) is 0.00%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that KFVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.