PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEYS vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEYS vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEYS achieves a 70.56% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 59.96% return. Over the past 10 years, KEYS has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 27.13%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 33.94% annualized return.


KEYS

1D
5.02%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
70.56%
6M
72.08%
1Y
118.85%
3Y*
28.52%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
27.13%

ASML

1D
4.72%
1M
19.51%
YTD
59.96%
6M
54.35%
1Y
130.24%
3Y*
34.36%
5Y*
21.92%
10Y*
33.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEYS vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEYS
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
70.56%26.50%0.97%-7.00%-17.16%56.34%28.71%65.32%49.23%13.75%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
59.96%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between KEYS and ASML is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.55

The correlation between KEYS and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEYS:

$59.96B

ASML:

$657.76B

EPS

KEYS:

$6.07

ASML:

$25.86

PE Ratio

KEYS:

57.10

ASML:

65.95

PEG Ratio

KEYS:

10.10

ASML:

4.34

PS Ratio

KEYS:

13.72

ASML:

19.60

PB Ratio

KEYS:

9.47

ASML:

31.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEYS:

$4.37B

ASML:

$33.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEYS:

$2.70B

ASML:

$17.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

KEYS:

$997.00M

ASML:

$12.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEYS vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEYS
KEYS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KEYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEYS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KEYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEYS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEYS vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEYSASMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

3.23

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.27

3.67

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.45

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.62

7.47

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.39

20.16

+8.22

KEYS vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEYS Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEYS and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEYSASMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

3.23

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.89

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Drawdowns

KEYS vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEYS drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEYS and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEYSASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-90.00%

+44.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-17.85%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.38%

-45.38%

+14.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.62%

-56.84%

+14.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.62%

-56.84%

+14.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

0.00%

-5.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-28.15%

+14.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

6.61%

-2.36%

Volatility

KEYS vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) is 10.49%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 15.19%. This indicates that KEYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEYSASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

15.19%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.95%

32.28%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.66%

40.59%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

42.03%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.15%

38.50%

-6.35%

Dividends

KEYS vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

KEYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.52%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
KEYS
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KEYS vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Keysight Technologies, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B202220232024202520260
8.77B
(KEYS) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KEYS and ASML have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to KEYS (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEYS dropped -45.54% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEYS and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer