KEMQ vs. SPY
KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMQ returned -3.07%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
KEMQ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return.
KEMQ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
KEMQ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 6.13% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 0.77% | -38.09% | -27.31% | 39.26% | 28.26% | -25.52% | 1.43% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and SPY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between KEMQ and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
KEMQ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMQ
SPY
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
KEMQ
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
KEMQ
SPY
Communication Services
KEMQ
SPY
Consumer Defensive
KEMQ
SPY
Healthcare
KEMQ
SPY
Financial Services
KEMQ
SPY
Industrials
KEMQ
SPY
Basic Materials
KEMQ
-
SPY
Energy
KEMQ
-
SPY
Real Estate
KEMQ
-
SPY
Utilities
KEMQ
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMQ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
KEMQ
SPY
KEMQ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEMQ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.39 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 3.01 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 13.54 | -10.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMQ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.72% | -55.19% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | -8.88% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.94% | -18.76% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -24.50% | -41.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.72% | -1.75% | -26.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.64% | -9.04% | -26.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 1.97% | +6.49% |
Volatility
KEMQ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMQ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 4.64% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.56% | 9.75% | +12.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.18% | 12.43% | +14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 17.14% | +14.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 17.99% | +11.66% |
KEMQ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 4.96% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMQ and SPY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMQ has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs -3.07% for KEMQ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs -3.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.
KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMQ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer