KEMQ vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
KEMQ and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both KEMQ and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KEMQ or FXI.
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and FXI is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KEMQ vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KEMQ:
1.64
FXI:
1.83
KEMQ:
2.40
FXI:
2.60
KEMQ:
1.30
FXI:
1.34
KEMQ:
0.67
FXI:
1.06
KEMQ:
4.72
FXI:
5.50
KEMQ:
9.05%
FXI:
10.65%
KEMQ:
26.13%
FXI:
32.08%
KEMQ:
-70.72%
FXI:
-72.68%
KEMQ:
-48.87%
FXI:
-29.18%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's 15.97% return.
KEMQ
18.97%
16.31%
24.51%
39.87%
-3.87%
N/A
FXI
15.97%
16.08%
37.80%
55.80%
-1.24%
0.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KEMQ vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KEMQ vs. FXI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KEMQ
FXI
KEMQ vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FXI's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.52% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% | 2.51% |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and FXI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KEMQ vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) is 5.84%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that KEMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.