PortfoliosLab logo
KEM vs. EDIV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KEM and EDIV is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KEM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Dynamic Emerging Markets Strategy ETF (KEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KEM:

0.32

EDIV:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

KEM:

0.61

EDIV:

1.10

Omega Ratio

KEM:

1.09

EDIV:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

KEM:

0.31

EDIV:

0.73

Martin Ratio

KEM:

0.64

EDIV:

1.97

Ulcer Index

KEM:

11.66%

EDIV:

5.15%

Daily Std Dev

KEM:

24.21%

EDIV:

13.93%

Max Drawdown

KEM:

-23.78%

EDIV:

-53.35%

Current Drawdown

KEM:

-12.67%

EDIV:

-1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEM achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 7.72% return.


KEM

YTD

5.31%

1M

1.17%

6M

4.64%

1Y

10.05%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EDIV

YTD

7.72%

1M

3.77%

6M

7.94%

1Y

12.58%

3Y*

16.03%

5Y*

13.70%

10Y*

5.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KEM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KEM and EDIV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KEM vs. EDIV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KEM is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KEM is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KEM is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KEM is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KEM is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KEM is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EDIV is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EDIV is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EDIV is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EDIV is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EDIV is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KEM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dynamic Emerging Markets Strategy ETF (KEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEM and EDIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KEM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

KEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than EDIV's 3.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KEM
KraneShares Dynamic Emerging Markets Strategy ETF
2.53%2.66%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
3.98%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.93%5.33%4.84%

Drawdowns

KEM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEM drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEM and EDIV.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KEM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Dynamic Emerging Markets Strategy ETF (KEM) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 3.16%. This indicates that KEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...